[Bug 861531] Restore GPL licensing option

2012-10-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861531 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED

[Bug 861531] Restore GPL licensing option

2012-10-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861531 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED ---

[Bug 861531] Restore GPL licensing option

2012-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861531 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #0) Description of problem: The SIL Open Font License is not really free. It is according to both the Fedora and GNU projects. 1. Consider the freedom to sell the

[Bug 861531] Restore GPL licensing option

2012-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861531 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com --- One more point, we still have liberation-fonts-1.07.2.tar.gz available in upstream under the Old license. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 861531] Restore GPL licensing option

2012-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861531 --- Comment #3 from luke-jr+redhatb...@utopios.org --- I have no particular reason to sell Liberation by itself, nor to sell the majority of software I use period. I do, however, have interest in only running (truly) free software so I don't have

[Bug 861531] Restore GPL licensing option

2012-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861531 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Hi Luke, While I take your point - and agree this restriction in the SIL OFL license seems unnecessary (dunno if it was added by SIL as some kind of protection against other profiting