https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #40 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System ---
liberation-fonts-1.07.3-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liberation-fonts-1.07.3-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #38 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
I said so because usually Mono fonts are designed in a Courier style without
italic, just slanted typefaces.
OK, so, if you need my help, you know where to contact me.
Good job anyway! ;)
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #37 from Pravin Satpute ---
No, Mono means Mono width, it is specifically required in terminal where fixed
grid structure creates need of mono-width font family.
We can have Mono serif family as well. Ok, in that case we will not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #36 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
As far as the character variant is concerned, it's a wish, not a bug. Should I
open a new bug report for it anyway?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsub
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #35 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
If you say there's no difference between the glyphs, just in width between Sans
and Mono, there's no need to change the glyph. By the way, I was wondering:
wasn't Mono supposed not to have italic gly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #34 from Pravin Satpute ---
(In reply to Alessandro Ceschini from comment #33)
> Hello Pravin,
>
> That's the problem: Mono and Sans are supposed to possess a different set of
> glyph aren't they?
No, only difference between Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #33 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
Hello Pravin,
That's the problem: Mono and Sans are supposed to possess a different set of
glyph aren't they? The fact that the glyphs for DE are identical in Mono and
Sans is no good to me, I think
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #32 from Pravin Satpute ---
Hi Alessandro,
Still not understanding both things :)
Mono Italic and Bold Italic "DE" shape is same like Sans, dunno not getting
your view clearly. Hoping you are talking about U+0434 only.
F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #31 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
The feature is called cvxx in OpenType (xx stands for numbers from 00 to 99).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #30 from Pravin Satpute ---
(In reply to Alessandro Ceschini from comment #28)
> Yes, using Serbian locale, but locl+salt is too generic, it could involve
> other variants, maybe also in the Latin range, while locl+cv00 is
> straigh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #29 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
I've just tested the glyphs and everything seems all right now, but Mono Italic
& Bold Italic DE still doesn't convince me, it's too "serified" for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #28 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
Yes, using Serbian locale, but locl+salt is too generic, it could involve other
variants, maybe also in the Latin range, while locl+cv00 is straightforward and
implies no other variants, just the int
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #27 from Pravin Satpute ---
Not understood. :(
When SHA alternate shape should occur?
When someone using Serbian locale, right?
let me know the test cases so i can tweak it according to requirement.
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #26 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
(In reply to Pravin Satpute from comment #25)
> Updated Mono PE shape, cant do much in DE shape. Update fonts available @
> http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/export/
>
> Hoping this will help.
Hello
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #25 from Pravin Satpute ---
Updated Mono PE shape, cant do much in DE shape. Update fonts available @
http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/export/
Hoping this will help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #24 from Pravin Satpute ---
Yes, i will update Mono PE and DE shape may be tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=X3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #23 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
Dear Pravin,
I'm afraid I won't be able to provide you with anything since other Mono fonts
normally don't have specific italic shapes, but the advice I can give you is to
make the glyphs more "squa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #22 from Pravin Satpute ---
I am not original designer of Liberation Mono so i am bit reluctant to do
modifications in style itself.
For Serbian we are mostly reusing already existing shapes of Mono, so i thought
will follow that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #21 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
1) OK
2) OK
3) I thought you deemed it inappropriate, have you changed you mind now? Why?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #20 from Pravin Satpute ---
* We can follow same height as used in Serif, will that work?
* Yeah in Sans Narrow that bar is too long, i just used macron glyph, i will
make it shorter.
* I will improve mono shapes as well, will make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #19 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
My comments about the new version:
* The space between the main body of Italic & Bold Italic GE, PE, TE, and SHA
and the bar is significantly shorter in Sans as compared to Serif. Is it
intended?
* T
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #18 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
(In reply to Pravin Satpute from comment #17)
> (In reply to Alessandro Ceschini from comment #16)
> > Created attachment 779820 [details]
> > Liberation Serbian Glyphs Test
> >
> > Liberation Mono:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #17 from Pravin Satpute ---
(In reply to Alessandro Ceschini from comment #16)
> Created attachment 779820 [details]
> Liberation Serbian Glyphs Test
>
> Liberation Mono:
> * Bold lacks localised glyph for BE
> * Italic & Bold Italic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #16 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
Created attachment 779820
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=779820&action=edit
Liberation Serbian Glyphs Test
I've uploaded an attachment with problematic glyphs highlighted in red.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #15 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
Liberation Serif Bold has no Serbian glyph for SMALL CYRILLIC BE
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/tok
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #14 from Pravin Satpute ---
Actually i tried to keep space between BAR and BASE glyph same between TE and
SHA.
I will again review it and update before release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #13 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
Yes, only in Italic shape. OK, I can see it too, but the space between the dash
and the main body is too little, it should be the same as in TE. The only thing
that changes is the position of the dash,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #12 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
OK, I can see it too, but the space between the dash and the main body is too
little, it should be the same as in TE. The only thing that changes is the
position of the dash, above or underneath.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #11 from Pravin Satpute ---
Yeah, that i was about to say.
I can see Alternate SHA shape. it is only applicable for Italic, right?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #10 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
I'm sorry, 1) doesn't apply, the italic shape is all right, what was under my
eyes was the former unupdated version, sorry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #9 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
Hello
1) the O-shaped main body of italic Serbian BE stil looks too similar to Greek
DELTA, just make it like the upright style BE, which is OK.
2) I can't see the alternate glyph for SHA? Have you in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute ---
Uploaded ttf version @ http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/export/ for testing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #7 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
(In reply to Pravin Satpute from comment #6)
> Serif and Mono is also done, will be available with the next release.
Hello Pravin, where can I download the updated font so that I can test it?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
Pravin Satpute changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from Pravin Sat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute ---
Thanks :)
Sans and Sans Narrow done. Will work tomorrow on Serif and Mono.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #4 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
(In reply to Pravin Satpute from comment #3)
> (In reply to Alessandro Ceschini from comment #0)
> > Hello everybody,
> >
>
> > 2) Serbian Regular/Italic BE is identical to Greek DELTA, which is bad,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute ---
(In reply to Alessandro Ceschini from comment #0)
> Hello everybody,
>
> 2) Serbian Regular/Italic BE is identical to Greek DELTA, which is bad, the
> tail above shouldn't be descending like in Greek DELTA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
Pravin Satpute changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Pravin Sat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428
--- Comment #1 from Alessandro Ceschini ---
Created attachment 773598
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=773598&action=edit
BE, PE, GE, DE, TE, SHA
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Uns
41 matches
Mail list logo
