DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] - IOException creating Postscript with graphics on Sun

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] - IOException creating Postscript with graphics on Sun

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] - IOException creating Postscript with graphics on Sun

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] New: - IOException creating Postscript with graphics on Sun

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Probs with underline, background, hyphenation, svg and more

Dear FOP-DEV, I'm using FOP to create a PDF version of an XML document. I've been using it for a few months, and have recently upgraded to version 0.20.1. I have come across various things that could be mistakes on my part or possibly problems with FOP. Any suggestions as to what is going on w

Jar Files

Hello: I just downloaded Fop-0.20.2. I have read that I need to set the class path for the following: fop.jar, xerces.jar and w3c.jar. I found fop.jar in the "build" folder, and a .jar called xerces-1.2.3 in the "lib" folder, but I can't find the w3c.jar. I have no experience with Java, so I

CHANGES file; 0.20.2RC is effectively 0.20.2 release

Hi, all I am feeling a bit grouchy about the CHANGES file, so please bear with me. What I'd like to suggest is that each committer modify and re-commit the CHANGES file as they commit files. In particular, this allows the person who is closest to the scene to _synopsize_ what they just did to

Re: ETA on 0.20.2

Hi, Lou It's probably easiest for me to fix up marker support, since I threw the existing code in there in the first place. It even worked, after a fashion, for a number of scenarios (although it didn't inherit properties from its virtual parent in the static-content, but rather from its lexic

avalon errors moving from 18 to 20.2

I just went from 0.18 to 0.20.2 and, after chaging my API calls, got the following errors: [javac] 90. org.apache.fop.apps.Driver driver = new org.apache.fop.apps.Driver(); [javac] <> [javac] *** Error: Could not find pac

RE: ETA on 0.20.2

Thanks. However, due to firewall issues, I can't get to your FAQ. I'm going to pull the source code and start looking through it. -Lou Alex McLintock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2001 12:38:26 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: ETA on 0.20.2

RE: ETA on 0.20.2

Steve: I get the message. -Lou COFFMAN Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2001 12:30:39 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: ETA on 0.20.2 No set date has been committed to. If you really need marker support, we'd be ha

RE: ETA on 0.20.2

--- COFFMAN Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No set date has been committed to. If you really need marker support, we'd > be happy to get any patches you'd care to send. We are, after all, > developing on a completely volunteer basis. > -Steve There was however at least one company willing t

RE: ETA on 0.20.2

No set date has been committed to. If you really need marker support, we'd be happy to get any patches you'd care to send. We are, after all, developing on a completely volunteer basis. -Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 08,

Re: ETA on 0.20.2

OK, but when will marker support be fixed? -Lou Arved Sandstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2001 09:55:47 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ETA on 0.20.2 At 09:07 AM 10/8/01 -0400, Louis Masters wrote: >When will 0.20.2RC become the official

Re: ETA on 0.20.2

At 09:07 AM 10/8/01 -0400, Louis Masters wrote: >When will 0.20.2RC become the official release? I REALLY need those >markers. >-Lou There seems to have been a lack of communication here, or some confusion. FOP-0.20.2 (and the RC is good to go, essentially...the only thing that is holding me u

Re: ETA on 0.20.2

When will 0.20.2RC become the official release? I REALLY need those markers. -Lou -- Forwarded by LMasters/Globaltechltd on 10/08/2001 09:03 AM --- Keiron Liddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/18/2001 06:02:46 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

[GUMP] Build Failure - Fop

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml init-avail: init-filters-xalan1: init-filters-xalan2:

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo FObj.java UnknownXMLObj.java XMLObj.java

keiron 01/10/08 02:56:38 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo FObj.java UnknownXMLObj.java XMLObj.java Log: fixed an npe Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +2 -2 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/FObj.java Index: FObj.java =

cvs commit: xml-fop/test/errors foreign.fo inavliddoc.fo inavlidxml.fo inavlidxml1.fo inavlidxml2.fo unknown.fo

keiron 01/10/08 02:55:22 Added: test/errors foreign.fo inavliddoc.fo inavlidxml.fo inavlidxml1.fo inavlidxml2.fo unknown.fo Log: added some tests with invalid xml or unknown namespaces Revision ChangesPath 1.1 xml-fop/test/erro

cvs commit: xml-fop/test/errors - New directory

keiron 01/10/08 02:53:20 xml-fop/test/errors - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Patch] Fop Ant task

This ahs been committed thanks. On Sun, 07 Oct 2001 20:16:50 Leo Sutic wrote: > All, > the FOP Ant task (org.apache.fop.tools.anttasks.Fop) does not support the > -c > command line option which enables one to embed fonts into the resulting > PDF. > > This patch adds an attribute "userconfig" to

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/tools/anttasks Fop.java

keiron 01/10/08 01:04:30 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/tools/anttasks Fop.java Log: applied patch to set config in fop task Submitted by: Leo Sutic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> also formatted and now sets the base dir properly for file sets Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +6

Antwort: RE: pdf freeze due to image?

Linda Zammit wrote: >So far it has only been on windows 2000... the URL that I sent was just a sample... >http://lzammit/whatever.gif"/> >would be more correct. This means you want to get "whatever.gif" via HTTP form the host "lzammit", which implies you'll have to run a webserver there able