Font Width

2002-10-06 Thread Balajee Chandrasekaran
Hi All, I want to change the font width of my report. Basically I want to accomodate more charaters perline of the report. So I beleive I have to reduce the font width of the characters so as to squeeze in more characters. I'm usinf FOP 0.20.4. I tried using "fot-stretch" property. But FOP ga

Re: fonts

2002-10-06 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Don't ask me for details (because I wasn't directly involved) but we had > to register new fonts with Linux so they got available in Batik for SVG. > So there seems to be some kind of font registry in Linux. That's probably the X Windows font registry which is used by the

Re:

2002-10-06 Thread J.Pietschmann
Arved Sandstrom wrote: > I think they screwed up the grammar. Me too. However, I think it would be really hard to press something which is "intuitive", consistent as well as easy to parse into a single grammar for all XSLFO porperties. It seems they fell for the same as the C preprocessor guys did

Re: fonts

2002-10-06 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Victor On 05.10.2002 22:51:28 Victor Mote wrote: > Jeremias & other FOP Developers: > > In addition to OpenType support, the other goal that I had for font work is > to support arbitrary fonts. My initial thoughts in this area revolved around > using the Java 2D capabilities. I understood tha

RE:

2002-10-06 Thread Arved Sandstrom
> -Original Message- > From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: October 6, 2002 2:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: > > > Arved Sandstrom wrote: > > And unless _I_ am missing something, "-" precisely matches that > production. > > > > You are looking at > > > > "'

Re:

2002-10-06 Thread J.Pietschmann
Arved Sandstrom wrote: > And unless _I_ am missing something, "-" precisely matches that production. > > You are looking at > > "'" [^']* "'" > > but I am looking at > > '"' [^"]* '"' > > According to the latter I can absolutely do "-". Well, in hyphenation-char="-" the hyphen is the expr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13347] New: - fo:table with inline-progression-dimension in %

2002-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE:

2002-10-06 Thread Arved Sandstrom
> -Original Message- > From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: October 6, 2002 1:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: > > > Arved Sandstrom wrote: > > An Expr can be a Literal, the production for which is > > > > '"' [^"]* '"' > > | "'" [^']* "'" > > > > If I lo

Re:

2002-10-06 Thread J.Pietschmann
Arved Sandstrom wrote: > An Expr can be a Literal, the production for which is > > '"' [^"]* '"' > | "'" [^']* "'" > > If I look at the first alternative, > > '"' [^"]* '"' > > it seems to me that I have pretty considerable leeway, and "-" isn't ruled > out at all. Erm, the expression is supp

RE:

2002-10-06 Thread Arved Sandstrom
> -Original Message- > From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: October 6, 2002 12:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: > > Arved Sandstrom wrote: > > Can you cite the specific productions that lead to this > conclusion? I am not > > saying that you are wrong but I c

Re:

2002-10-06 Thread J.Pietschmann
Arved Sandstrom wrote: > Can you cite the specific productions that lead to this conclusion? I am not > saying that you are wrong but I can't find it. > > I must be tired. ;-) I just looked at the XML 1.1 production for AttValue > which is Don't look at XML AttValue, look at the XSLFO property e

Re: fonts

2002-10-06 Thread J.Pietschmann
Victor Mote wrote: > I am thinking through ways to eliminate as much user involvement in using > non-base-14 fonts as possible. Is there a performance benefit to parsing the > XML metric files instead of extracting the information directly from the > font file itself at runtime? Well, as far as I

RE:

2002-10-06 Thread Arved Sandstrom
> -Original Message- > From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: October 6, 2002 12:00 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: > > > Arved Sandstrom wrote: > > Why is character="-" a parsing error? The XML Recommendation > has at least > > one example of an attribute value

Re:

2002-10-06 Thread J.Pietschmann
Peter B. West wrote: >> Just for curiosity: what should happen if the following snippet >> is used: >> >> > > > This looks OK. I see potential for an Obfuscated FO Code Contest :-) J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re:

2002-10-06 Thread J.Pietschmann
Arved Sandstrom wrote: > Why is character="-" a parsing error? The XML Recommendation has at least > one example of an attribute value that contains a hyphen. This comes from assuming that every unqoted sequence of characters which is not a number, mesutrement or a color has to be interpreted as

RE:

2002-10-06 Thread Arved Sandstrom
> -Original Message- > From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: September 30, 2002 11:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: > > Arved Sandstrom wrote: > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Tony Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >>Peter B. West wrote at 30 Sep 2

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo FoRoot.java

2002-10-06 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2002/10/06 07:28:02 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design FoRoot.java Log: Changed exception handler. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.1.2.7 +5 -5 xml-fop/src/org/apache/

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination FoLayoutMasterSet.java

2002-10-06 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2002/10/06 07:18:05 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design FoLayoutMasterSet.java Log: Removed SubSequenceSpecifier references. Simplified exception catching and handling. Revision ChangesPath No

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination FoPageSequenceMaster.java

2002-10-06 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2002/10/06 07:15:11 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design FoPageSequenceMaster.java Log: Remove all SubSequenceSpecifier code. Removed no-event constructor. Revision ChangesPath No revisio

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination FoSinglePageMasterReference.java FoSimplePageMaster.java

2002-10-06 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2002/10/06 07:01:19 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design FoSinglePageMasterReference.java FoSimplePageMaster.java Log: Get master-name directly from propertySet[]. Revision ChangesPath

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination PageMasterAlternatives.java PageCondition.java

2002-10-06 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2002/10/06 06:56:15 Added: src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design PageMasterAlternatives.java PageCondition.java Log: Classes for constructing page master alternatives. Revision ChangesPath No revis

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13345] New: - table-cell border information seems to be ignored?

2002-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11529] - , DocBook 1.53 and FOP don't want to play nice.

2002-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11614] - DocBook programlistings are garbled in PDF, etc

2002-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b