Yeah...I know the rules. When I see stuff to patch, I patch it, if someone doesn't
beat me to it. I don't mind not having CVS checkin, honestly...I'm just good at
groaning. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 5:00 AM
To:
Peter B. West wrote:
While I don't denigrate any of these ongoing efforts, I am increasingly
of the view that everything occurring between the reading of the fo xml
and the layout of the area tree is interconnected in very nasty and
intricate ways. The description of this process in the Rec
Chris Bowditch wrote:
What you say is true, but I think you missed one thing from your
analysis:
what if solution A took x seconds and B took x+2 seconds, but B had a
greater level of compliance and produced better results than solution A?
Then you would want to give the users the choice
Response below (one of these glorious days, I can stop using Outlook...)
-Original Message-
From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 7:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: hack to avoid memory overflow with tables
FOP is ultimately a
--- Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moreover, is FOP really that far from, say, the HTML
rendering engine in a web browser with respect to
layout decisions? I see a lot of interpretations
and opinions going on in those engines, which is
why two browsers sometimes interpret my HTML
Jeremias,
On 5/28/2003 12:02 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'm grateful that you indicate problem spots in our documentation and
offer suggestions. But may I encourage you to just do (TM) the changes
yourself and submit patches in the future? Your suggestions would make
it on the website a lot
On 5/28/2003 12:02 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
A comment concerning the hyphenation patterns: I think what you suggest
is necessary but there was also the idea of sparing the average FOP user
the necessity to dig into licensing issues. A really frustrating
experience. Just for the record. :-)
On
J.Pietschmann schrieb:
Hi all,
now that there are a few more modifications in the maintenance
branch, waht about including the fixes mentione here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-userm=105371539508744w=2
It would need some testing (read 0.20.5rc4)
Nooo, no more RCs for 0.20.5 please
It's
Hi,
Can we stop the generated PDF file from being saved? If yes, how?
Can we lock the generated PDF file so that it can't be altered by any adobe
acrobat creator? If yes, how to do that?
Really need this information urgently. Thanks.
-Susan-
You can use PDF encryption to do that. Please read the documentation:
http://xml.apache.org/fop/pdfencryption.html
I recommend you use FOP 0.20.5rc3a.
(Please post questions about FOP on the fop-user mailing list next time so
other users can profit from questions and answers, too. Thank you!)
10 matches
Mail list logo
