pbwest 2003/06/28 18:02:22
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Base all relevant properties on ${basedir}.
Remove jimi libraries from dist.bin.lib fileset.
Revision ChangesPath
1.85 +15 -16xml-fop/build.xml
Index: build.xml
J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Victor Mote wrote:
> > BTW, we'd better change the name of FOPResult if we're going to
> try to sell
> > this to a wider audience :-)
> abbr for FormattingObjectsProcessingResult. No need to change :-)
Just don't be surprised to see a counter-proposal RenderXResult, an ab
Victor Mote wrote:
BTW, we'd better change the name of FOPResult if we're going to try to sell
this to a wider audience :-)
abbr for FormattingObjectsProcessingResult. No need to change :-)
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Except for Avalonization (which I admit I don't understand, but which I
> > understood not to be a factor here), I don't see what functionality your
> > model provides over mine. On the Avalonization issue, I guess
> the easy way
> > to get to the heart of the matter is
Looking at the CVS history, I believe it's a relic from the times where
FOP had, cough, jimi.jar, cough, in CVS.
On 28.06.2003 16:23:47 Peter B. West wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > No, of course not.
>
> Well, ..er, ..um, no, of course. Supplementary question: was that entry
> perhaps inte
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
No, of course not.
Well, ..er, ..um, no, of course. Supplementary question: was that entry
perhaps intended to be to be an exclude?
Peter
On 27.06.2003 06:36:17 Peter B. West wrote:
I just noticed
in the dist.bin.lib fileset of build.xml in HEAD. Is that supposed to b
Ok, but that's a special purpose API that has (almost) nothing to do
with XSL transformation. And it's only a proprietary API because there
is no standard API for this.
On 28.06.2003 13:23:21 J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > The problem with this example is that I can't think of a
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
The problem with this example is that I can't think of any reason why I
would need a Xalan-specific API (if there is still one).
Everytime you need something to do which is not in JAXP, like
using an XPath to select nodes from a DOM.
J.Pietschmann
-
On 26.06.2003 21:48:10 Victor Mote wrote:
> > Then you mean reuse in the context of producing multiple output formats
> > in one renderung run?
>
> Yes. Even if we think we don't want that now, we should have the flexibility
> to add it later.
Granted. I thought about that myself. I don't see wh
No, of course not.
On 27.06.2003 06:36:17 Peter B. West wrote:
> I just noticed
>
> in the dist.bin.lib fileset of build.xml in HEAD. Is that supposed to be
> there?
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
10 matches
Mail list logo