Re: FOP components

2004-02-07 Thread Peter B. West
Peter B. West wrote: J.Pietschmann wrote: ... - avalon and logging for the base library. ... BTW 1. I'd like to get rid of the servlet.jar in our CVS. 2. If we standardize on JDK 1.4 as base (as it currently is), we could drop the Xerces, Xalan and xml-api jars as well. Our Jars seem to be some

(test message)

2004-02-07 Thread Glen Mazza
Pardon me...just testing POP forwarding... Thanks, Glen

Re: FOP components

2004-02-07 Thread Peter B. West
J.Pietschmann wrote: ... - avalon and logging for the base library. ... BTW 1. I'd like to get rid of the servlet.jar in our CVS. 2. If we standardize on JDK 1.4 as base (as it currently is), we could drop the Xerces, Xalan and xml-api jars as well. Our Jars seem to be somewhat outdated anyway.

Re: FOP components

2004-02-07 Thread Glen Mazza
--- "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - avalon and logging for the base library. > The avalon jar is indeed quite small (only 25K or so), but this dependency I'd like us to eventually get rid of in favor of what Xalan does with its messaging and i18n instead. (I suspect AH or RX don't

FOP components

2004-02-07 Thread J.Pietschmann
Hi, while fiddling with the New API it dawned me there are actually several packages in FOP: - the basic engine, embeddable - a CLI wrapper - a servlet wrapper - an Ant task - the font utilities - the hyphenation data utilities (basically the Ant task) - a variety of extenstions. Perhaps the AWT vi

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/table Row.java

2004-02-07 Thread pietsch
pietsch 2004/02/07 15:10:19 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/table Row.java Log: Fixed the missing table header bug. Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +2 -2 xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/table/Row.java Index: Row.java ===

cvs commit: xml-fop build.xml

2004-02-07 Thread pietsch
pietsch 2004/02/07 15:03:44 Modified:.build.xml Log: Don't copy codegen files. Pass graphics configuration adapter source to javadoc. Random xdoc directory reference fixes (still incomplete). Revision ChangesPath 1.104 +27 -25xml-fop/build.xml Ind

JUnit test failure

2004-02-07 Thread J.Pietschmann
Hi all, I get a nice Junit failure: Testcase: testFO2PDFWithDOM took 0.23 sec Caused an ERROR loader constraints violated when linking org/w3c/dom/Node class java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraints violated when linking org/w3c/dom/Node class at org.apache.xalan.transformer.Transformer

RE: Just a small question...

2004-02-07 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Keep in mind, Andreas, Apache Geronimo is already > > running into headaches, apparently including > > complaints on "arc

RE: Just a small question...

2004-02-07 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
> -Original Message- > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yes, indeed, of course. I don't know the difference > between US and European laws here--but most companies Actually there is probably not that much difference WRT the law 'in se' (for those who remember the patentabili

RE: Just a small question...

2004-02-07 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
> -Original Message- > From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > > > > Peter / Nikolai, > > > > I think I should be the one to apologize here, as Nikolai seems > > to have been offended by one of *my* unreflected shoots from the hip ... > > Andreas, > >