On 28.02.2004 20:16:56 Clay Leeds wrote:
> It would also be nice, if there were some sort of "repository" or links
> page on the FOP site where people can go to get hyphenation files that
> cannot be included in FOP because they do not meet the needs of the
> ALv2 (assuming there are no negativ
On Feb 28, 2004, at 1:22 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Especially for the hyphenation patterns this may still be problematic
because someone who does a hyphenation file conversion may not be
entitled to submit it to the ASF because he is not the (only)
copyright holder and license restrictions may not
> -Original Message-
> From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This simplification, even if
> temporary, drops the average IQ needed to understand
> the Renderer classes perhaps 30 points, more into my
> range*, hopefully opening the door for more developers
> to start filling out th
The (documentation) sources all need a license header (docs and
src/documentation). That's one part remaining. The other is the rest of
the hyphenation files. But there it may not be so simple as to apply the
Apache license. We will need to doublecheck the audit results and see
where we can apply t
With the help of many people I've done an licensing audit last March.
See the Wiki page [1] for the whole protocol. The original Dutch
hyphenation file that was used to create nl.xml is published under the
LPPL license which includes a restriction that makes it impossible for
The Apache Foundation
