Re: Committing documentation

Glen Mazza wrote: Simon, a word of caution*, I believe that anything that goes into the Apache repository will need to be copyright The Apache Software Foundation and only The Apache Software Foundation. (Just look at the bottom No, the contribution is covered by the CLA (which you should have rea

Re: Withdrawal of PMC nomination

Thanks for the elaboration--also the links to the pull parsing sites. Glen --- "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All of the requirements for inputs, transformations, > etc, are the same, > because I am using SAX "under the hood." But when a > native pull parser > comes along, say as

Re: fox validation

Oh please do... --- Simon Pepping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After that I > want to work on the layout. > > Regards, Simon >

Re: Committing documentation

Simon, a word of caution*, I believe that anything that goes into the Apache repository will need to be copyright The Apache Software Foundation and only The Apache Software Foundation. (Just look at the bottom of any of the FOP site's web pages.) Else, best not to commit it--we can always add a

Re: Committing documentation

On Jul 25, 2004, at 11:43 AM, Simon Pepping wrote: I am preparing my documentation for check-in into the repository. What would be a suitable place. A directory in src/documentation/content/xdocs? Would that be in the way of the forrest build of the web site? Regards, Simon I've been thinking about

Re: Building site with forrest

Simon, I have been working at getting the xml-fop web site working for many months (at first using forrest-0.5.1, and more recently with forrest-0.6 since they're about to release a new version). More recently, I've had some success, but I'm currently working with the forrest-dev list to get th

Committing documentation

I am preparing my documentation for check-in into the repository. What would be a suitable place. A directory in src/documentation/content/xdocs? Would that be in the way of the forrest build of the web site? Regards, Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl

Re: fox validation

Thanks. I did not know about the change. It certainly is a better writing style. I am still finishing the details of my documentation. After that I want to work on the layout. Regards, Simon On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:20:50PM -0700, Glen Mazza wrote: > Yes, the way I see it, one of FOP's success

Building site with forrest

I have tried to build the site with forrest, without much success. I had a few problems: 1. Validation error. I solved this problem by creating an OASIS catalog. 2. Files in build/webapps/content are missing. These problems can be solved by copying src/documentation/content into webapps, or by

Re: Withdrawal of PMC nomination

Glen Mazza wrote: --- "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremias' ideas about factoring out useful stand-alone elements from the combination of FOP and Batik are essential to the direction I am taking with layout and rendering, aside from being a Good Thing in their own right. Yes, I

Bug report for Fop [2004/07/25]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[GUMP@brutus]: xml-fop/xml-fop success

pace/xml-batik/batik-20040725/lib/batik-util.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-batik/batik-20040725/lib/batik-swing.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-batik/batik-20040725/lib/batik-css.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-batik/batik-20040725/lib/batik-bridge.jar:/usr/local/gump/public

[GUMP@brutus]: xml-fop-maintenance/xml-fop-maintenance success

.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-batik/batik-20040725/lib/batik-util.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-batik/batik-20040725/lib/batik-swing.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/works