Re: FOP performance on Win98/JRE 1.3.1

2001-12-12 Thread Lukas Pietsch
Hello, okay, here's the result: with the new version of Xalan (2.2.D14), the .fo to .pdf part of the conversion is really a good deal faster. ("[DEBUG]: Avg render time: 1050ms/page"). What's still slow is the preceding docbook-to-.fo conversion. And I've also found out that it makes no big d

Re: FOP performance on Win98/JRE 1.3.1

2001-12-12 Thread Lukas Pietsch
> I use FOP with Xalan and I have noticed that the performance is really > better with the last version of Xalan (the speed is multiply by 10) !!! That sounds interesting. FOP 0.20.2 is being distributed with a file called xalan-2.0.0.jar. Is it technically okay to just go and grab a newer vers

Re: FOP performance on Win98/JRE 1.3.1

2001-12-12 Thread Lukas Pietsch
Thanks, James, for the detailed comments. Not that I understood everything of it--I'm afraid I'm rather unexperienced with Java in general. Your suggestions sound quite convincing, only I don't know how to actually carry them out. Now maybe what follows is terribly boring newbie stuff. In that

FOP performance on Win98/JRE 1.3.1

2001-12-11 Thread Lukas Pietsch
ndows 98, with a 500MHz AMD-K6 processor and 128 MB memory, using FOP 0.20.2 (sorry, I wrongly said 0.20.0 in the earlier mail) and the Java JRE 1.3.1. What could I do to diagnose the problem better? Thanks for any pointers, Lukas Pietsch