Jeremias,
From my understanding of the spec, encryption MUST be the last step.
Encryption will not make the size grow, but it does negate any benefit that
ASCII85 or ASCIIHEX filters provide and THEY do make the file larger.
In a nutshell, I would disable the ASCII85 or ASCIIHEX filters, if
Manual,
I think so... the encryption objects are associated with the PDF Document so
as long as there is only on thread in a given PDF document instance, you
should be good to go.
Pat
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Mall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 4:57 AM
Clay,
Right now the options are pass the the render. Examples can be found in the
command line implementation. But to save you some time, the rendor options
are pass as a hash map (name value pairs) to the render. If any encryption
options are passed, encryption is enabled. The value names are as
Clay,
Ooops... sorry, you asked about command line.
J,
Thanks for all your help pulling this together.
Pat
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PDF Encryption in HEAD
Clay Leeds
committed PDF encryption support by Patrick C. Lankswert to
the redesign. The bad message is that it doesn't work yet. I get blank
pages in Acrobat when enabled, although the PDF looks good when compared
with one generated by the maintenance branch. I guess that's the same
problem you had, Jörg? Well
The encryption filter uses the number and generation as part of the hash to
generate the key for a given object. In short, the encryption key is
different for every object and is based on the number and generation of the
object. I would have preferred something simpler but the PDFXObject is not
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Add jce-jdk13-118.jar (for 1.3.x) to %JAVA_HOME%\jre\lib\ext and add
security.provider.6=org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider
to %JAVA_HOME%\jre\lib\security\java.security in the appropriate section.
This should work
:
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Has anybody looked at this?
Yes. I'm currently in the process of integrating the stuff.
I'll have to do some more test, in particular for JDK1.3 compatibility
(no javax.crypto there).
Commit deferred to next Friday.
J.Pietschmann
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Thanks... if there are any issues or work that is needed, I'm MORE than
happy to help.
I got the JDK 1.3 compatibility now.
However, while testing the encryption I'm getting
Cannot find any provider supporting RC4
The JCE
Hey,
Has anybody looked at this? It's been two weeks since I submitted it and I
have not heard anything. Did I miss something? I'd like to get this included
before the code base changes and I have to reimplement by hand.
Pat Lankswert
-Original Message-
From: Patrick C. Lankswert
Thanks... if there are any issues or work that is needed, I'm MORE than
happy to help.
Pat
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Has anybody
Chris,
Thanks...
Pat
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 5:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Encryption
From: Patrick C. Lankswert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, it does not seem to support the CVS diff command. When
To all that may concern,
Here it is... PDF encryption. Unfortunately, I seem to be lame when it comes
to cvs. When I generate the unified using WinCVS's cvs diff -uN, it does
not include the file PDFEncryption.java. I have included it as a second
attachment. It belongs in src/org/apache/fop/pdf.
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Hi Patrick
On 10.02.2003 06:17:26 Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Ok... with two separate weekends of the stomach flu in my house, it took a
little longer than I had hoped. However, I have a working copy of the V1
R2
encryption with support for user and owner passwords
to add encryption.
Would you like to help? We can use all the help we can get.
On 09.01.2003 07:34:09 Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
I tried to determine the reason from the archives with clarity... but why
isn't PDF encryption in the core?
Jeremias Maerki
an MIT licence which is compatible with the APL
AFAIK. You wouldn't have to do any debugging and testing on the
cryptography stuff that way.
On 10.01.2003 00:25:16 Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Outside of clean up, I have working code. It is
limited since only PDF 1.3
To all,
I tried to determine the reason from the archives with clarity... but why
isn't PDF encryption in the core?
Pat Lankswert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
17 matches
Mail list logo
