Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression

2001-09-18 Thread Eric Dalquist
I'll see if I can write up a test example tomorrow afternoon for it. -Eric Dalquist - Original Message - From: "Keiron Liddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 4:29 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression >

Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression

2001-09-18 Thread Jeremias Maerki
One is already there: examples/fo/images.fo. PDF came down from 28KB to 17KB. Great work, Eric!!! And thanks to Keiron for taking it into CVS. On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:29:19 +0200 Keiron Liddle wrote: > Eric, > > I have committed the patch since it looks to be working ok and there seems > to be a

Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression

2001-09-18 Thread Keiron Liddle
Eric, I have committed the patch since it looks to be working ok and there seems to be a general consensus that it is a good thing. Of course if possible it would be good for people to supply some test examples. Keiron. On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 19:47:40 Eric Dalquist wrote: > Jim, > > I found the

RE: [PATCH] JPG Compression

2001-09-17 Thread Jim Wright
Eric: Latest patch does seem to solve the current header problem quite nicely. Thanks! jw -Original Message- From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression Jim, I found the bug. I

RE: [PATCH] JPG Compression

2001-09-17 Thread Jim Wright
the XSL documents are not all that huge. Thanks again! jw -Original Message- From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression Jim, I found the bug. I imagine this isn't the last time

RE: [PATCH] JPG Compression

2001-09-17 Thread Jim Wright
That's very cool. Thanks, Eric! jw -Original Message- From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression Jim, I found the bug. I imagine this isn't the last time something like

Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression

2001-09-17 Thread Eric Dalquist
- Original Message - From: "Jim Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 11:01 PM Subject: RE: [PATCH] JPG Compression > Hey Eric: > > Been working with the patched stuff on and off all day -- still looks great! > >

RE: [PATCH] JPG Compression

2001-09-16 Thread Jim Wright
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 4:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression Jim, If you could please email me one of those jpegs it is erroring off on I'll look into the reasons. A fix shouldn't be too hard. I forbgot all a

Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression

2001-09-15 Thread Eric Dalquist
Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 12:32 PM Subject: RE: [PATCH] JPG Compression > Wow! > > That works like a charm! Thanks a lot, Eric. > > In my preliminary tests, Eric's patch moved a pdf with 6 heavily compresse

RE: [PATCH] JPG Compression

2001-09-15 Thread Jim Wright
PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 5:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH] JPG Compression Attached is the diff for the patch. This is going against the latest release build. When reading the diff "G:\Fop-0.20.1\Fop-0.20.1-clean" is the untouched distribution "G:\Fo

RE: [PATCH] JPG Compression

2001-09-14 Thread Jim Wright
I'm going to give this a try straight away! Thanks a lot. jw -Original Message- From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 5:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH] JPG Compression Attached is the diff for the patch. This is going agains

[PATCH] JPG Compression

2001-09-14 Thread Eric Dalquist
Attached is the diff for the patch. This is going against the latest release build. When reading the diff "G:\Fop-0.20.1\Fop-0.20.1-clean" is the untouched distribution "G:\Fop-0.20.1\Fop-0.20.1-dev" is the modified distribution. It should work y just copying over the attached files and then delet