Hi,
I finally managed to update FOP to REC syntax..
According to the documented changes at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/sliceF.html#changes
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/PR-xsl-20010828/sliceF.html#changes
the biggest thing was the renaming of the "master-name" property to
"master-r
Hi,
I finally managed to update FOP to REC syntax..
According to the documented changes at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/sliceF.html#changes
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/PR-xsl-20010828/sliceF.html#changes
the biggest thing was the renaming of the "master-name" property to
"master-r
MAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] update FOP (maintenance branch) to REC syntax
Hi,
I finally managed to update FOP to REC syntax..
According to the documented changes at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/sliceF.html#cha
"John H. Wyman" wrote:
>
> Christian,
> Do you think you could put the fixes you sent me, so the inline works
> across a block ?
Yes, I definitely want do it (as time permits..)
> John
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA
Thanks!
I added the patch to cvs.
Tore
> Hi,
>
> I finally managed to update FOP to REC syntax..
>
> According to the documented changes at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/sliceF.html#changes
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/PR-xsl-20010828/sliceF.html#changes
>
> the biggest thing
an Geisert
cc:
Subject: [PATCH] update FOP
(maintenance branch) to REC syntax
05-
Claus Nielsen wrote:
>
> Christian,
>
> When is page-position "last" correct implemented ?
When someone sends a patch ;-)
Seriously, I don't know anything about the current status of
page-position "last". Maybe Arved can comment on it ?
> Claus
Christian
---
