Glen Mazza wrote:
> I moved RTF and MIF to new fop.render.* packages.
> Also the RTF Library has been moved under render.rtf.
> Now most of our render-type specific code is under its
> respective render type in our package structure. I
> hope this becomes a cleaner design, if not we can
> revisit
Team,
I moved RTF and MIF to new fop.render.* packages.
Also the RTF Library has been moved under render.rtf.
Now most of our render-type specific code is under its
respective render type in our package structure. I
hope this becomes a cleaner design, if not we can
revisit moving non-render spe
Victor,
We're much more in agreement than I thought--I'll
respond more a little bit later this weekend. (Brain
dead right now.) In particular, I like your multiple
JAR idea--that's what Batik does quite well (you may
want to see their build.xml).
In the meantime, if you could get Peter's patch o
Glen Mazza wrote:
> My current inclination after reading Victor and your
> posts:
>
> 1.) (Still), move org.apache.fop.pdf to
> org.apache.fop.render.pdf.pdfdoc (rename it similar to
> our rtfdoc package). Get it cleaned up and perfected,
> etc., remove obsolete classes, etc. *Then* discuss
> it
On 30.10.2003 01:50:49 Glen Mazza wrote:
> My current inclination after reading Victor and your
> posts:
>
> 1.) (Still), move org.apache.fop.pdf to
> org.apache.fop.render.pdf.pdfdoc (rename it similar to
> our rtfdoc package). Get it cleaned up and perfected,
> etc., remove obsolete classes,
--- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is no unsolvable problem. We just have to find
> the best way which
> may also lie in between opinions. One way may just
> be not to do anything
> at all right now or another to let Glen put his
> no-nonsense proposal to
> action until there
On 28.10.2003 14:40:29 Victor Mote wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> > > For example, we could easily make Peter Herweg a
> > > committer for the RTF libraries and renderer, but there is some
> > hesitation
> > > (even on my part, who thinks Peter does good work) to turn him loose in
> > > layo
On 28.10.2003 03:56:27 Glen Mazza wrote:
> Tom DeWeese of Batik made that suggestion a few months
> back--we're tentatively in agreement that once FOP
> gets solidified, the transcoders can move to them for
> their maintenance and documentation.
Looks like I missed that one. I still haven't read
Glen Mazza wrote:
> Making a nice framework for others to create a
> FOP-like product is not as big a concern for me. I
> want to create FOP, not something to be used for
> creating a FOP.
Hmmm. I think this comment is directed at me.
WRT the first sentence, since this is open source with an Ap
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > For example, we could easily make Peter Herweg a
> > committer for the RTF libraries and renderer, but there is some
> hesitation
> > (even on my part, who thinks Peter does good work) to turn him loose in
> > layout until we know more about him, which takes time. In the
--- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glen,
>
> first of all, thanks for your continuing effort in
> the development
> towards 1.0.
>
Sure thing--two patches down, 21,234,198 to go! ;)
>
> Take the two Transcoders (for PDF and PS) for
> example. They could just
> as well be in Bati
On 27.10.2003 18:38:07 Victor Mote wrote:
> +1. The RTF stuff is already set up in a separate directory this way. This
> is primarily due to the design of the JFOR crew. MIF should be done the same
> way. And I agree that the same could be done with fonts.
>
> I would actually prefer to see a
Glen Mazza wrote:
Two changes I would like to make to the 1.0dev branch:
1.) Rename the org.apache.fop.area.inline.Word class
to org.apache.fop.area.inline.Text, and rename the
renderWord() method in the Renderer subclasses to
renderText().
+1
2.) Move the org.apache.fop.pdf package to a new
o
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Two changes I would like to make to the 1.0dev branch:
> >
> > 1.) Rename the org.apache.fop.area.inline.Word class
> > to org.apache.fop.area.inline.Text, and rename the
> > renderWord() method in the Renderer subclasses to
> > renderText().
>
>
>
> > This is confusin
Glen,
first of all, thanks for your continuing effort in the development
towards 1.0. I'm sad that I currently don't have the time to contribute
and have been extremely happy when I saw the first few patches targeted
at HEAD coming in recently.
On 27.10.2003 13:53:33 Glen Mazza wrote:
> Team,
>
Team,
Two changes I would like to make to the 1.0dev branch:
1.) Rename the org.apache.fop.area.inline.Word class
to org.apache.fop.area.inline.Text, and rename the
renderWord() method in the Renderer subclasses to
renderText().
Reason: It's a lot clearer, given the data these
objects hold and
16 matches
Mail list logo
