John Austin wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 15:34, Victor Mote wrote:
> > ANNOUNCEMENT: I have just committed a change that 1) allows
> LayoutStrategy
> > to tell whether an FO Tree should be built, 2) has Driver act
> on this, i.e.
> > to build an FO Tree only if LayoutStrategy indicates that this
John Austin wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 15:34, Victor Mote wrote:
Geez! I was thinking more along the lines of plugging in a few new data
structures for property lookup. I am exploring the old implementation
through the marvel of code grooming in order to understand it.
Don't worry, I have the
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 15:34, Victor Mote wrote:
> ANNOUNCEMENT: I have just committed a change that 1) allows LayoutStrategy
> to tell whether an FO Tree should be built, 2) has Driver act on this, i.e.
> to build an FO Tree only if LayoutStrategy indicates that this should be
> done. This should t
ANNOUNCEMENT: I have just committed a change that 1) allows LayoutStrategy
to tell whether an FO Tree should be built, 2) has Driver act on this, i.e.
to build an FO Tree only if LayoutStrategy indicates that this should be
done. This should theoretically allow Peter's logic to be used as a
LayoutS