DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33729] New: - basic-link external-destination (.pdf#dest=) only open pdf file not destination

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33729 Summary: basic-link external-destination (.pdf#dest=) only open pdf file not destination Product: Fop Version: all Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32327] - Basic-link w/ 'mailto:' URL behave improperly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32327] New: - Basic-link w/ 'mailto:' URL behave improperly

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32327 Summary: Basic-link w/ 'mailto:' URL behave improperly Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compone

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31039] - URL in basic-link is scrambled by encryption

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31039 URL in basic-link is scrambled by encryption --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 13:58 --- Created an attachment (id=12632) example pdf with printing disabled (link doesn't work)

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31039] - URL in basic-link is scrambled by encryption

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31039 URL in basic-link is scrambled by encryption --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 13:57 --- Created an attachment (id=12631) example pdf with no encryption (link works)

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31039] - URL in basic-link is scrambled by encryption

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31039 URL in basic-link is scrambled by encryption --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 13:56 --- Created an attachment (id=12630) example xsl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31039] - URL in basic-link is scrambled by encryption

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31039 URL in basic-link is scrambled by encryption --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 13:56 --- Created an attachment (id=12629) example xml

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31039] New: - URL in basic-link is scrambled by encryption

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31039 URL in basic-link is scrambled by encryption Summary: URL in basic-link is scrambled by encryption Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27111] New: - basic-link after some elements/attributes does not render hyperlink in output PDF

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27111 basic-link after some elements/attributes does not render hyperlink in output PDF Summary: basic-link after some elements/attributes does not render hyperlink in output PDF Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platfo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25467] - basic-link external-destination to http://site/document.pdf broken

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25467 basic-link external-destination to http://site/document.pdf broken --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-22 11:45 --- Hello community, Not knowing if this is a bug or a feature I solved this for me patching th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25467] - basic-link external-destination to http://site/document.pdf broken

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25467 basic-link external-destination to http://site/document.pdf broken --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-12 11:15 --- And I saw that on http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/contrib/FOP/ you render ... http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25467] New: - basic-link external-destination to http://site/document.pdf broken

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25467 basic-link external-destination to http://site/document.pdf broken Summary: basic-link external-destination to http://site/document.pdf broken Product: Fop Version: 0.20.4 Platform: Other OS/Version:

RE: PDF "meta" properties (was Re: basic-link)

> -Original Message- > From: Clay Leeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I was unaware that FOP has the ability to add Producer, Author and Title > properties to FOP. In fact, the web site still shows "FOP does not > currently support several desirable PDF features: document properties > (titl

Re: PDF "meta" properties (was Re: basic-link)

Clay Leeds wrote: I was unaware that FOP has the ability to add Producer, Author and Title properties It can be set via the PDF renderer API, at least for HEAD. Maybe the producer is hardcoded to "FOP" or something (look into the source for details). It's not accessible on the command line yet. J.

PDF "meta" properties (was Re: basic-link)

Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: Right you are! Same here... A little experience with iText, but since FOP supports encryption and the producer / author / title props, I have seen little use for iText. I was unaware that FOP has the ability to add Producer, Author and Title properties to FOP. In fact, t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23099] New: - Computed contents inside of basic-link doesn't create a link

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23099 Computed contents inside of basic-link doesn't create a link Summary: Computed contents inside of basic-link doesn't create a link Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: Sun OS/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22053] New: - basic-link off by footer height in table

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22053 basic-link off by footer height in table Summary: basic-link off by footer height in table Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: Normal Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14569] - basic-link problem

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14569 basic-link problem --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-02 21:51 --- Does anyone have any idea of how to clean this up? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14569] - basic-link problem

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14569 basic-link problem --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-02 21:37 --- Oleg, I appreciate the advice, but I was actually creating an attachment to #14248 when Mozilla went down in a screaming heap. This mess is presumably the result. I'l

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14569] - basic-link problem

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14569 basic-link problem [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

Re: basic-link brocken (maintenance branch)

did was change the default merge behavior to yes. Is there something else broken? Regards, Karen Jeremias Maerki wrote: I fixed a bug there, but this obviously brought another. I'll have a look at it. On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:17:59 +0100 Christian Geisert wrote: Hi, I just discoverd that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14569] - basic-link problem

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14569 basic-link problem --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-19 08:32 --- Please, provide you fo document as *attachment*, not as plain text within a description. Your example was screwed up by hyphenations, I'm unable to fix 22 page docume

Re: BASIC-LINK

Sergio wrote: and the render crashes... If I make different the name of the basic-link or the name of the block id, the pdf is well rendered. I have anothers .fo files with many more links that are well rendered, but this file no. Why ? Looks too bizarre, open a bug in bugzilla and

BASIC-LINK

Hí again   I'm going crazy with this kind of problems...   I'm rendering a pdf file of 22 pages. at the first of the file, I have the following basic links:   tarariiislkjalskjdflksjdflkasjdlfkasjdlfkasjldfkjasldfjl basic-link color='#ff' text-decoration=&

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13406] - Using "padding" displaces basic-link

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13406 Using "padding" displaces basic-link [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: basic-link brocken (maintenance branch)

I fixed a bug there, but this obviously brought another. I'll have a look at it. On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:17:59 +0100 Christian Geisert wrote: > Hi, > > I just discoverd that basic-link isn't working as expected > in the maintenance branch (docs/example/fo/links.fo for examp

basic-link brocken (maintenance branch)

Hi, I just discoverd that basic-link isn't working as expected in the maintenance branch (docs/example/fo/links.fo for example) It seems that mergelinks() is the problem so I'll change the default links.merge to no if there are no objections. (IIRC there has been some discussion about

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 664] - Basic-Link does not move with its content, when using absolute postitioned block containers

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=664 Basic-Link does not move with its content, when using absolute postitioned block containers [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13406] - Using "padding" displaces basic-link

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13406 Using "padding" displaces basic-link --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-06 09:18 --- I found the same problem within a table. As a workaround I added 'space' blocks in the cell Dav

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13406] - Using "padding" displaces basic-link

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13406 Using "padding" displaces basic-link --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-08 13:23 --- Created an attachment (id=3388) Test case - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13406] New: - Using "padding" displaces basic-link

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13406 Using "padding" displaces basic-link Summary: Using "padding" displaces basic-link Product: Fop Version: 0.20.4 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Normal

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8968] - basic-link with internal-destination attribute doesn't work inside static-content element

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8968 basic-link with internal-destination attribute doesn't work inside static-content element [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3462] - basic-link does not work in list-items inside tables other than 1st column

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3462 basic-link does not work in list-items inside tables other than 1st column [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Stat

Re: Maintenance release: improvements to basic-link

Hi all, I haven't seen anything about the next maintenance release for about a week now, but I noticed that there had been some discussion about basic-link problems. In the meantime, I have improved the basic-link positioning and also made it work for external-graphic and foreign-i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8968] - basic-link with internal-destination attribute doesn't work inside static-content element

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8968 basic-link with internal-destination attribute doesn't work inside static-content element --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-11 10:46 --- The clickable region of a hyperlink is not the same as the position of the text when the margi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8968] - basic-link with internal-destination attribute doesn't work inside static-content element

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8968 basic-link with internal-destination attribute doesn't work inside static-content element [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8968] - basic-link with internal-destination atribute doesn't work inside static-content element

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8968 basic-link with internal-destination atribute doesn't work inside static-content element [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8968] New: - basic-link with internal-destination atribute doesn't work inside static-content element

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8968 basic-link with internal-destination atribute doesn't work inside static-content element Summary: basic-link with internal-destination atribute doesn't work inside static-content element Product: Fop

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007 broken basic-link when referencing a following page [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1231] - basic-link can't link to a page-sequence element

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1231 basic-link can't link to a page-sequence element [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 964] - FOP 0.17 throws exception with basic-link in xsl-region-before/after

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=964 FOP 0.17 throws exception with basic-link in xsl-region-before/after [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Stat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007 broken basic-link when referencing a following page [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PRO

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5888] - basic-link gets wrong coordinates when using padding-top somewhere above

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5888 basic-link gets wrong coordinates when using padding-top somewhere above [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Stat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007 broken basic-link when referencing a following page [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PRO

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3462] - basic-link does not work in list-items inside tables other than 1st column

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3462 basic-link does not work in list-items inside tables other than 1st column --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-04-22 11:14 --- The links are there, the areas are shifted to the upper left corner of the table. Another example that link area calculat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007 broken basic-link when referencing a following page [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PRO

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007 broken basic-link when referencing a following page [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PRO

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3204] - basic link mouse sensitive area wrongly positioned

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3204 basic link mouse sensitive area wrongly positioned [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 964] - FOP 0.17 throws exception with basic-link in xsl-region-before/after

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=964 FOP 0.17 throws exception with basic-link in xsl-region-before/after [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007 broken basic-link when referencing a following page --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-02-25 14:01 --- The same patch should also be applied in org/apache/fop/fo/flow/Block.java: if (area.getIDReferences() !

Basic Link.

Hello, I want to add a link in the header and footer. While rendering the PDFRenderer adds the basic link object to the list of links. But the link appears as simple text in the output pdf. Is this some sort of a bugor there's something missing ? Any way around to get this done. Than

RE: basic-link internal-destination>

Hello, Suhail Rashid the id is unique . Actaully in my whole document only have one basic-link and only one id. Do you have any idea or do u done before about internal-destination where the in one page and in another page? hope you can help me. Thank you. lpkhoo

RE: basic-link internal-destination>

the id has to be unique.. possibly ur assigning the same id at more than one location in your document.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Hi, I'm facing a problem in

Re: [DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3007] broken basic-link when referencing a following page

It is commited into the current CVS-tree but not in the recent release 0.20.1. Enrico > 01:50 --- + Am also experiencing similar difficulties. > + I see there is a work around supplied but not added to the product. When > is it + likely that the fix will be applied to the core product? > Unf

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3462] New: basic-link does not work in list-items inside tables other than 1st column

=3462 *** shadow/3462 Thu Sep 6 08:09:46 2001 --- shadow/3462.tmp.22168 Thu Sep 6 08:09:46 2001 *** *** 0 --- 1,139 + ++ + | basic-link does not work in list-items inside tables other than 1st

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3007] broken basic-link when referencing a following page

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007

RE: Basic Link

le.diff > > Enrico, thanks for pointing this patch as it was languishing. > -Steve > > -Original Message- > From: Enrico Schnepel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 4:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Basic Link > > &

RE: Basic Link

iff -u MyJava.java.orig MyJava.java >> patchfile.diff Enrico, thanks for pointing this patch as it was languishing. -Steve -Original Message- From: Enrico Schnepel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 4:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Basic Link Hello Keiron, I had

Re: Basic Link

> Basic links that have a destination that will be on a following page are > broken. > The changes involving the stream renderer do not check to make sure that > the links are resolved before rendering the page, or more correctly, the id > references don't care about basic links. Unfortunately th

Re: Basic Link

> Basic links that have a destination that will be on a following page are > broken. > The changes involving the stream renderer do not check to make sure that > the links are resolved before rendering the page, or more correctly, the id > references don't care about basic links. You have just fo

Basic Link

Basic links that have a destination that will be on a following page are broken. The changes involving the stream renderer do not check to make sure that the links are resolved before rendering the page, or more correctly, the id references don't care about basic links. To fix this someone will n

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 1231] basic-link can't link to a page-sequence element

! AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! URL: ! Cc: ! Summary: basic-link can't link to a page-sequence element ! It seems that when a basic-link element has got an internal-destination attribute that points to a page-seq

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3204] basic link mouse sensitive area wrongly positioned

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3204

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3204] basic link mouse sensitive area wrongly positioned

=3204 *** shadow/3204 Tue Aug 21 06:16:46 2001 --- shadow/3204.tmp.3201Tue Aug 21 06:21:23 2001 *** *** 17,20 (For 0.20.1, PDF) basic-link "mouse sensitive area" is to the north-east of the basic-link text, making it rather difficult to click the link. !

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3204] New: basic link mouse sensitive area wrongly positioned

=3204 *** shadow/3204 Tue Aug 21 06:16:46 2001 --- shadow/3204.tmp.3186Tue Aug 21 06:16:46 2001 *** *** 0 --- 1,20 + ++ + | basic link mouse sensitive area wrongly positioned

Re: [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

Hi, thank you for resolving the problem. Your files are working fine. I am running into another problem now but I am still trying to locate and separate it. Regards Enrico -- Aufgepasst - jetzt viele 1&1 New WebHosting Pakete ohne Einrichtungsgebuehr + 1 Monat Grundgebuehrbefreiung! http://pu

[Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007

[Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007

[Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007

[Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007

[Bug 3007] New: - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

=3007 *** shadow/3007 Mon Aug 6 13:28:29 2001 --- shadow/3007.tmp.8146Mon Aug 6 13:28:29 2001 *** *** 0 --- 1,124 + ++ + | broken basic-link when referencing a following page