Very good. I'll start adding to it as soon as I've finished moving files
around and documenting the embedding samples.
On 13.01.2003 19:55:22 J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Yes, but on a new Wiki page on the new API. We've got to scratch
> > together what already has been discus
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Yes, but on a new Wiki page on the new API. We've got to scratch
together what already has been discussed and put that on that page.
I made a page behind the Avalonization link, currently
focussing on API issues.
Someone with more Avalon background should add internal
Aval
On 13.01.2003 12:23:13 Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
> > I'm not asking for deleting InputHandler and friends, only in the
> > documentation. Altough I'd like to delete them in the redesign. But
> > that's another story.
> Lets discuss?
Yes, but on a new Wiki page on the new API. We've got to scratch
tog
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Is it OK if I just throw out some usage patterns in the embedding
documentation? There's some contradicting information there and also
stuff that isn't that easy to understand. InputHandler and friends dates
back to pre-JAXP times. JAXP is known to most u
Is it OK if I just throw out some usage patterns in the embedding
documentation? There's some contradicting information there and also
stuff that isn't that easy to understand. InputHandler and friends dates
back to pre-JAXP times. JAXP is known to most users doing embedding and
is most
