Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns (was: HyphenationTree bug and Portuguese hyphenation file update)

2003-02-17 Thread Togan Muftuoglu
* Jeremias Maerki; [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 14 Feb, 2003 wrote: tr.xml Can't find original file. No licence. Check with author. Well, since I sent out the Turkish hyphenation file I should know where it comes right. The trhyphen.tex is installed from the SuSE 8.1 distro toganm@earth:~/hangar rpm

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns (was: HyphenationTree bug and Portuguese hyphenation file update)

2003-02-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I can do that. Thanks for the info. On 17.02.2003 16:47:17 Togan Muftuoglu wrote: * Jeremias Maerki; [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 14 Feb, 2003 wrote: tr.xml Can't find original file. No licence. Check with author. Well, since I sent out the Turkish hyphenation file I should know where it comes

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns (was: HyphenationTree bug and Portuguese hyphenation file update)

2003-02-14 Thread Jeremias Maerki
That's correct. When you donate source code (be it Java or something else) to a project of the Apache Foundation it gets the Apache licence. You must also be entitled to transfer the rights on the code to Apache Foundation. For example, when you write code when working for a company you may not

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns (was: HyphenationTree bug and Portuguese hyphenation file update)

2003-02-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I'd say we can't keep something like that within our codebase because it contradicts the Apache licence. It is entirely possible that someone sells a product that uses FOP. That wouldn't violate the Apache licence but the licence of this hyphenation file. Recent discussions on various Apache

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns (was: HyphenationTree bug and Portuguese hyphenation file update)

2003-02-13 Thread Keiron Liddle
I'd say we can't keep something like that within our codebase because it contradicts the Apache licence. It is entirely possible that someone sells a product that uses FOP. That wouldn't violate the Apache licence but the licence of this hyphenation file. Recent discussions on various Apache