> = J.Pietschmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [ ... ]For working on HEAD, pick an area:
> - layout core
> - a renderer
> - the font subsystem
> - API and configuration
> - parsing and property resolution
> - FO extensions [ ... ]
Thanks for the great suggestions. This one message taught me more
about
> Yes, we've been talking about structure-based renderers (like RTF and MIF)
> vs. layout-based ones (PDF being the focal point) for some time.
[ ... ]
> 4) My suggestion is to first use the RTF library from jfor in binary form,
by
> including jfor's jar in the FOP distribution, to create the R
Hi Marcelo,
On Thursday 10 October 2002 14:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
> RTF is not intended to provide full rendering capabilities, it is
> in scope somewhere between docbook and FO. It mixes style and content,
> the illness for which stylesheets where designed.
>. . .
Sure, I don't kn
Although I'd appreciate the capability to produce RTF files from DocBook
documents, I really don't think FOP would be the right tool to do it. RTF
is not intended to provide full rendering capabilities, it is in scope
somewhere between docbook and FO. It mixes style and content, the illness
for w
J.Pietschmann wrote:
...
>
> For working on HEAD, pick an area:
> - layout core
> - a renderer
> - the font subsystem
> - API and configuration
> - parsing and property resolution
Don't pick this one. There is definitely a lot of work going on in this
area, which will at least be relevant to
Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR) wrote:
>>So what I was hoping for is a suggestion for something that I can work
>>on that might be useful, but not critical to any immediate plans,
>>ideally something that overlaps little with currently active portions of
>>the project.
>
>
> There were no replies yes
Hi Scott,
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 17:15, Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR) wrote:
>. . .
> So is integrating other renderers something that the group
> would eventually like to do?
>. . .
Yes, we've been talking about structure-based renderers (like RTF and MIF)
vs. layout-based ones (PDF being the
Sauyet, Scott wrote:
> Does anyone have a suggestion about something I could look at fixing /
> enhancing which is not mission-critical, but which might give me a chance
> to look at a fair bit of the code?
There are some documents in the trunk docs/design directory that have a list
of things th
2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Developer Suggestion
Hi Scott
Your offer is highly appreciated even if the feedback to your initial
mail was a bit sparse. :-) We're all struggling for time to work on FOP
and gladly take any helping hand.
On 09.10.2002 17:15:21 Sauyet, Scott
Hi Scott
Your offer is highly appreciated even if the feedback to your initial
mail was a bit sparse. :-) We're all struggling for time to work on FOP
and gladly take any helping hand.
On 09.10.2002 17:15:21 Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR) wrote:
> > = Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> = Scot
> = Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> = Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Does anyone have a suggestion about something I could look at fixing /
>> enhancing which is not mission-critical, but which might give me a chance
>> to look at a fair bit of the code?
> The integration of jfor
Hi Scott,
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 16:20, Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR) wrote:
> Does anyone have a suggestion about something I could look at fixing /
> enhancing which is not mission-critical, but which might give me a chance
> to look at a fair bit of the code?
The integration of jfor (www.jfor
Me:
> So what I was hoping for is a suggestion for something that I can work
> on that might be useful, but not critical to any immediate plans,
> ideally something that overlaps little with currently active portions of
> the project.
There were no replies yesterday.
Does anyone have a sugge
Hi, my name is Scott Sauyet, a Java developer in Connecticut, USA. I'm
new to this group. I've been reading for about a month, but have made
no contributions yet.
I would like to contribute. Eventually, I hope to understand the system
well enough to produce a spin-off which could render out
14 matches
Mail list logo
