Clay Leeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote 28.05.2004 17:57:59:
> The nice thing about this, is that one could set up parameters (stored
> in config files), to help determine how the output would be rendered.
> The 'holder' could consult the config file to determine how to proceed.
>
> Among the item
On May 28, 2004, at 8:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 28.05.2004 17:16:08:
Thanks Arnd. My argument is that the renderer must tell the layout
engine about font metrics. I have always regarded PDF and PS (with
obligatory fonts) as stable targets in th
"Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 28.05.2004 17:16:08:
> Thanks Arnd. My argument is that the renderer must tell the layout
> engine about font metrics. I have always regarded PDF and PS (with
> obligatory fonts) as stable targets in this respect.
They are. PostScript files and P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28.05.2004 01:15:26:
I suppose that everyone has noticed this exchange on fop-user.
Peter
Mike Kellstrand wrote:
Mark,
I ran the PDF through Ghostscript and it looks like it is doing the
trick.
I did notice that the same PDF pr
"Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28.05.2004 01:15:26:
> I suppose that everyone has noticed this exchange on fop-user.
>
> Peter
>
> Mike Kellstrand wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > I ran the PDF through Ghostscript and it looks like it is doing the
trick.
> > I did notice that the same PD
I suppose that everyone has noticed this exchange on fop-user.
Peter
Mike Kellstrand wrote:
Mark,
I ran the PDF through Ghostscript and it looks like it is doing the trick.
I did notice that the same PDF printed in Ghostscript vs. Adobe print
out with slightly different size fonts.Arg! :)
