Please provide a link to your company's site so we can sample the ported
code. Thanks.
--
David B. Bitton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.codenoevil.com
Code Made Fresh DailyT
- Original Message -
From: Mark Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fop-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002
60143
Voice: (630) 250-3045 x2164
Fax: (630) 250-3046
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kowalczyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: C# version of FOP
This project would be very important to those of us that plan to use C
[Jim Urban] As long as development of the C# version does interfere with
the development of the Java version, I have no problem with people
porting FOP to C#. However, I believe the primary effort should remain
the Java version.
If C# FOP or Batik implementations keep pace with the Java state
This project would be very important to those of us that plan to use C#
when Mono (.NET CLR, C# Compiler on Linux/*NIX) is ready. I had always
expected to use Batik and FOP through webservices, decoupled from my
ASP.NET that will run on Mono in the near future.
If C# FOP or Batik implementations
Hi, Steve
Speaking as an individual committer I think it's excellent that you've done
this. I happen to be completely language-agnostic and I'll use anything that
works, including everything in the MS stable.
I would recommend that you start a Sourceforge project to take this further.
Once
