Re: Is the current build of FOP broken?

2003-11-14 Thread Will Peterson
OK ... Thanks.   Is it just that samples that are broken?  I'm just looking for some "embedding FOP sample code" esp. for the Object to PDF.   If this is the case, is there code other places I could look at.  (for example the command line tool "fop.bat")   Thanks,   -Will>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/

Re: Is the current build of FOP broken?

2003-11-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
No, the examples are quite ok actually. It's the Driver class that has a problem in getContentHandler(). Sorry for not being clear enough. By the way, you mentioned you're interested in RTF output which shoudn't be affected by this problem. The code in ExampleObj2PDF should work fine if you use RTF

Re: Is the current build of FOP broken?

2003-11-15 Thread Glen Mazza
Incidentally, for 1.0, I had difficulty in getting RTF to work with simple FO documents. It seems to generate an RTF-based script, but Windows isn't accepting it on my machine. Wordpad just opens it up as text, showing the underlying RTF script-code. Has anyone else tried the 1.0 RTF renderer?

Re: Is the current build of FOP broken?

2003-11-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Yep, current CVS code generates working RTF code (on my machine). I've opened readme.fo (-->readme.rtf) in Wordpad and OpenOffice, for example. A big problem I can currently see is that all normal text has white color, so initially you see practically nothing. Selecting all text and applying black

RE: Is the current build of FOP broken?

2003-11-15 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Yep, current CVS code generates working RTF code (on my machine). I've > opened readme.fo (-->readme.rtf) in Wordpad and OpenOffice, for example. > A big problem I can currently see is that all normal text has white > color, so initially you see practically nothing. Select

RE: Is the current build of FOP broken?

2003-11-15 Thread Peter Herweg
> A big problem I can currently see is that all normal text has white > color, so initially you see practically nothing. Selecting all text and > applying black color brings the text to light. Yes, i can confirm that behaviour. A simple example looks good in Word 97/2000, but Wordpad displays the