Re: FOP DTD attached (updated)

2002-03-06 Thread david
I opened the attached DTD in XML Spy, and the validation failed at: ... !ATTLIST character %Aural_Properties_List; ... element 'character' is undefined. Is this important? -- David B. Bitton [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.codenoevil.com Diversa ab illis virtute valemus. - Original Message -

Re: FOP DTD attached (updated)

2002-03-06 Thread Chuck Paussa
David, If you look at the comments at the top of the DTD, you'll find instructions on how to strip out those elements not implemented in FOP Chuck Paussa - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

RE: fop dtd attached

2002-02-15 Thread j.pilgrim
Title: RE: fop dtd attached Hi, Chuck Paussa recently posted a FOP.dtd. First: Thank you very much! Second: Is it really a FOP.DTD? I think it's rather a FO.DTD (note the small difference: FOP vs. FO), isn't it? Chuck guessed that people are asking for an FOP.DTD to use it with PSGML