Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are you so keen on removing stuff? I'd be more
concerned about
adding the stuff that's missing for an initial
release.
Just cleaning up for the next release.
Jimi works fine
for some people. No reason to remove this.
OK, so it
Not a stupid question at all, but no, with FOP 0.20.5 you still need
either JIMI or JAI for PNG support. But it may well be that the next FOP
version will support PNG without an additional library. For now, you're
stuck, though.
On 01.10.2004 15:31:15 Dalibor Topic wrote:
I haven't been
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Not a stupid question at all, but no, with FOP 0.20.5 you still need
either JIMI or JAI for PNG support. But it may well be that the next FOP
version will support PNG without an additional library. For now, you're
stuck, though.
thanks for the quick responce, Jeremias. I'm
If you got a long breath, yes. We're are still a few months from a
release. The layout code is in the process of being completely rewritten,
so many features available in 0.20.5 are still missing.
On 01.10.2004 17:10:34 Dalibor Topic wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Not a stupid question at all,
On 01.10.2004 18:06:13 Clay Leeds wrote:
Please clarify:
As the Subject implies, Glen's original message indicated he wanted to
remove Jimi (I understand that won't be the case now). He said nothing
of removing JAI, and as far as I understand, FOP-1.0 will still need
JAI for PNG support
On Oct 1, 2004, at 2:30 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 01.10.2004 18:06:13 Clay Leeds wrote:
Please clarify:
As the Subject implies, Glen's original message indicated he wanted to
remove Jimi (I understand that won't be the case now). He said nothing
of removing JAI, and as far as I understand,
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are you so keen on removing stuff? I'd be more
concerned about
adding the stuff that's missing for an initial
release.
Just cleaning up for the next release.
Jimi works fine
for some people. No reason to remove this.
OK, so it does work
Why are you so keen on removing stuff? I'd be more concerned about
adding the stuff that's missing for an initial release. Jimi works fine
for some people. No reason to remove this.
On 24.09.2004 05:31:21 Glen Mazza wrote:
(resending...having email problems)
Team (probably Jeremias),
(resending...having email problems)
Team (probably Jeremias),
According to [1] JIMI is for pre-Java2 JDK's (1.1
series). JAI is for 1.3 or later JDK's [2], which is
FOP 1.0's area of concern. If so, does this mean we
can get rid of image.JimiImage in HEAD, FOP 1.0
presumably not designed to
