Sorry, I didn't see it. It's not particularly easy to keep up with all
the known defects.
As to mixing block elements and text, it may not be the best style, but
from our point of view is more practical -- the old form vs function
debate and in my case function wins every time.
Thanks for the r
Matthew L. Avizinis wrote:
The following fo apparently causes the last line of text from the text
area of the parent fo:block to be rendered twice, once before the child
fo:block and once after it.
See Bugzilla #17472. Either don't mix block elements and text (bad style
anyway), or get CVS code.
The following fo apparently causes the last line of text from the text
area of the parent fo:block to be rendered twice, once before the child
fo:block and once after it. That is, supposing that "deducted as an
itemized deduction" is the last line of the parent block, this same text
will be rep