Ah yes, that makes sense. Thanks a lot Vincent. I didn't think about
that.
On 21.02.2005 21:54:19 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
> > Am I right that for a table-cell in collapsing border model the
> > conditional part of a (ex. in border-before-width)
> > has no effect (i.e.
Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
Am I right that for a table-cell in collapsing border model the
conditional part of a (ex. in border-before-width)
has no effect (i.e. is ignored)?
I would answer no, actually not exactly.
If I understand the spec correctly, the conditional part has an effect only if
the
Then, I'm wondering how to handle the conditional part (7.7.9) in this
case because I don't have a clue and it seems not to go well with the
collapsing nature of these borders as well as the rules 1-5 in 6.7.10
for border-collapse="collapse". Also, I don't think "the associated edge
is (can be) a l
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Am I right that for a table-cell in collapsing border model
> the conditional part of a (ex. in
> border-before-width) has no effect (i.e. is ignored)?
That doesn't sound right. I just did a cursory review of the standard and
can't find any support for that. However, t
Am I right that for a table-cell in collapsing border model the
conditional part of a (ex. in border-before-width)
has no effect (i.e. is ignored)?
Thanks,
Jeremias Maerki
