t
> > > part of it would they sell? Hmmm. Can even they do this within the
> > > licensing rules of this project?
> > >
> > >
> > > -Matt
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Charles Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Huaxin Zhang wrote:
>
> I am interested in most html2pdf, html2fo, but after I tried
> any of them, i am frustrated. some very lame ones support only
> 3 tags even. so i am wondering this tool support all html
> tags specified in HTML 4.0 DTD?
Nope, it supports XML only.
Ulrich
--
Ulrich M
t; > viewing on the web. Although I guess it could cut into sales of their
> > full-version Acrobat (what used to be called Exchange). So what part of it
> > would they sell? Hmmm. Can even they do this within the licensing rules of
> > this project?
> >
> >
>
If you edit text in a structured way, i.e. using soft formattings instead of
hard ones, you can use any tool as a structured editor - for flat
structures, because e.g. both Word and StarOFfice can apply soft formats
("styles") only sequentially. You can have some algorithm to bring a deeper
struct
e called Exchange). So what part of it
> would they sell? Hmmm. Can even they do this within the licensing rules of
> this project?
>
>
> -Matt
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Charles Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001
play around
with the source.
So far I have not found a tool that does everything...
Aaron Mehl
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:56 PM
Subject: RE: no visual tool for FOP?
>
ules of
this project?
-Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: no visual tool for FOP?
>
>
> Hi team
>
> This is also something I am curious about.
Hi team
This is also something I am curious about. Here are two embryonic ideas -
can anyone see any merit in them?
1 XMLSpy seems to have the ability to convert a Word document to XML. Could
XSLT be used to transform this XML to FO, and thence to PDF? Then Word could
be used as the "visua
M
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: no visual tool for FOP?
> I am wondering if there is no way for users
> to generate WISWIG xsl:fo files?
>
> like for HTML, users would use Dreamweaver, rather
> than writing programs Document doc.addElement(new Table(...)).
>
HP released
> I am wondering if there is no way for users
> to generate WISWIG xsl:fo files?
>
> like for HTML, users would use Dreamweaver, rather
> than writing programs Document doc.addElement(new Table(...)).
>
HP released something recently. I haven't tried it, but you can find it here:
http://w
ECTED]
cc:
11/12/01 02:29 PM
Subject: no visual tool for FOP?
Please respond to fo
I am wondering if there is no way for users
to generate WISWIG xsl:fo files?
like for HTML, users would use Dreamweaver, rather
than writing programs Document doc.addElement(new Table(...)).
I think it should be the same for PDF. Is there
any program that intakes a parsed XHTML and convert it
12 matches
Mail list logo
