Re: patch process

2002-11-18 Thread Ralph LaChance
At 07:05 AM 11/18/02, you wrote: Oleg Tkachenko wrote: Christian Geisert wrote: http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/xml-fop/ We should add this to the documentation... http://xml.apache.org/fop/download.html mentions it already. Doh .. well .. Ralph should really RTFM ;-) I did - about 2 years

Re: patch process

2002-11-18 Thread Christian Geisert
Oleg Tkachenko wrote: Christian Geisert wrote: http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/xml-fop/ We should add this to the documentation... http://xml.apache.org/fop/download.html mentions it already. Doh .. well .. Ralph should really RTFM ;-) Christian ---

Re: patch process

2002-11-18 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Christian Geisert wrote: http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/xml-fop/ We should add this to the documentation... http://xml.apache.org/fop/download.html mentions it already. -- Oleg Tkachenko eXperanto team Multiconn Technologies, Israel --

Re: patch process

2002-11-18 Thread Christian Geisert
Ralph LaChance wrote: Hi all, I've worked out (and will submit via bugzilla) both an explanation and a solution to the text measuring & layout problems that I reported recently in the awt and awt/print renderers. Great. I believe it makes sense to add the changes to the maintenance branch (in

Re: patch process

2002-11-18 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Ralph LaChance wrote: I believe it makes sense to add the changes to the maintenance branch (in the event that there is ever an 0.20.5 release); in turn, they will be useful to inform the awt and awt/print renderer in the redesign, so I'll separately submit them to there if necessary. Make sens

patch process

2002-11-15 Thread Ralph LaChance
Hi all, I've worked out (and will submit via bugzilla) both an explanation and a solution to the text measuring & layout problems that I reported recently in the awt and awt/print renderers. I believe it makes sense to add the changes to the maintenance branch (in the event that there is ever an