[PDF Viewer] Utility request - Followup

2002-08-01 Thread Kevin O'Neill
a PDF rasterizer that looks as though it could be used to create a PDF viewer -k. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-30 Thread Rhett Aultman
Heh...just give me some time. We might get Java 1.1 compatibility dynamically loaded yet. ;) -Original Message- From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request Victor, The IAC, by this

Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Peter B. West
Victor, FOP has no control over any downstream uses of generated PDF, clearly. Any project that works with the PDF is logically independent of FOP, so it would belong in a separate project, as you suggest. It would be unfortunate if folks got the idea that FOP was somehow more fully realised

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Victor Mote
Peter B. West wrote: > > Victor, > > The IAC, by this account, only has support for Macintosh and DDE/OLE on > WIndows. While some work on support for OLE 2 document formats has been > done in the Jakarta POI project, I don't know that this will solve the > problem of cross-platform support for

Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Peter B. West
x27;t done it, so maybe it is all theory that doesn't > work for the application at hand. And I don't mean to be argumentative -- it > just seems that writing a good PDF viewer would be a big enough task that I > would want to exhaust other possibilities before heading down

Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread J.Pietschmann
Keiron Liddle wrote: > (One day I will convince someone to help out with HEAD code) The problem here is that HEAD is nearly as much of a mess as the maintenance branch, with the unfortunate disadvantage that it doesn't work. I'd rather put work into something which can be downloaded and compiled

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Victor Mote
hand. And I don't mean to be argumentative -- it just seems that writing a good PDF viewer would be a big enough task that I would want to exhaust other possibilities before heading down that path. Victor Mote (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Enterprise Outfitters (www.outfitr.com) 2025 Eddington W

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Rhett Aultman
Or would optionally need caching services that fit the "unsigned" security model. For example, applets could cache to their servers. -Original Message- From: Jim Urban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 8:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PDF Viewe

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Jim Urban
Inc. corporate offices at (435) 654-0621 -Original Message- From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 4:53 AM To: FOP Subject: RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 11:40, RamanaJV wrote: > Ralph, > Your idea of "Fixing the awt re

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Ralph LaChance
At 06:01 AM 7/29/02, I wrote: >Anyone volunteering to profile awt's memory usage ? Dumb comment. Sorry - Keiron's got the right answer ' Best, -Ralph LaChance - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Ralph LaChance
current issues with AWT renderer and step >accordingly. > >Ramana. > > > >-Original Message- >From: Ralph LaChance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:06 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request > > >I agree

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Ralph LaChance
At 01:33 PM 7/28/02, you wrote: >If it helps any, Adobe has a pretty comprehensive Acrobat SDK. Links to it >can be found at http://partners.adobe.com/asn/developer/sdks.html. I haven't >had a good excuse to do it myself, but my impression is that if tighter >integration is required, it could be d

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 11:40, RamanaJV wrote: > Ralph, > Your idea of "Fixing the awt renderer" is the correct one. After a > deep thought, I too came to the conclusion that instead of writing a PDF > renderer, if we can tune up the AWT renderer, it will be great. The main > problem with AWT

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread RamanaJV
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request I agree with Oleg's last sentencetotally - which I translate roughly to "lets fix the awt renderer" In fact, I'd add a 3rd (or 2 1/2) user - the one who wishe

Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Ralph LaChance
I agree with Oleg's last sentencetotally - which I translate roughly to "lets fix the awt renderer" In fact, I'd add a 3rd (or 2 1/2) user - the one who wishes to go directly from xml to a printer via fop. My colleagues here and I have inserted several changes to tweak spacings, borders, and s

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Ralph LaChance
t speak for others, but this has never been a problem in my time as a >user of FOP. My general FO document development process: > >1) Fiddle with FO document >2) Run through FOP, producing PDF file >3) Point my web browser at the PDF file >4) Web browser launches PDF viewer

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-28 Thread Victor Mote
Rhett Aultman wrote: <-Start-> Yes, it's called Acrobat Reader. What's being requested is something a little more tightly integrated to FOP. <-End-> RamanaJV wrote: <-Start-> Acrobat reader is a outside application. If I launch it through a swing application, it gives the

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-28 Thread Rhett Aultman
EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Fri 7/26/2002 7:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request Folks, Excuse my ignorance but is the pdf viewer everyone is talking about provided already by

Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-28 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Matthew L. Avizinis wrote: It might also be helpful to recognize that as FOP becomes more popular there > are distinctly _two_ groups of "users" emerging. The first group has been > using FOP from the beginning and those are the Java developers who use FOP > to create some other end product. R

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-27 Thread RamanaJV
ile 3) Point my web browser at the PDF file 4) Web browser launches PDF viewer, either as a plugin or an external process (depending on if I'm at my Windows or Solaris box) 5) I view the document, closing the external reader, if necessary 6) Go back to 1, except I click the browser's refr

Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-26 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Ralph LaChance wrote: > At 12:46 PM 7/25/02, you wrote: > >> After seeing the OutOfMemoryError, the AWT renderer is >> causing, why >> don't thinking of providing a PDF viewer in the FOP itself. I think, this >> will be useful so much. I don't

Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-26 Thread Mark Malone
Folks, Excuse my ignorance but is the pdf viewer everyone is talking about provided already by Adobe on a huge number of platforms and called acrobat reader? Or is it something else that is being requested? Also, pdf file reading is built into MacOS X as is pdf generation via native print

Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-25 Thread Ralph LaChance
At 12:46 PM 7/25/02, you wrote: > After seeing the OutOfMemoryError, the AWT renderer is causing, why >don't thinking of providing a PDF viewer in the FOP itself. I think, this >will be useful so much. I don't think people couldn't have ever thought >about it, b

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-25 Thread Victor Mote
Ramana wrote: > ... why don't thinking of providing a PDF viewer in the FOP itself. Perhaps I am missing something. Is the freely available Acrobat Reader insufficient for the task? Victor Mote (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Enterprise Outfitters (www.outfitr.com) 2025 Eddington Way

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-25 Thread Rhett Aultman
I see FOP's role as being a data transformer first and foremost. We may want to consider packaging a PDF viewer with FOP, but I'd recommend against putting it *IN* FOP. -Original Message- From: RamanaJV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:47 PM

[PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-25 Thread RamanaJV
Dear FOP developers, After seeing the OutOfMemoryError, the AWT renderer is causing, why don't thinking of providing a PDF viewer in the FOP itself. I think, this will be useful so much. I don't think people couldn't have ever thought about it, but is it diffucult to do s

RE: pdf viewer

2001-10-10 Thread Alistair Hopkins
inal Message- From: Paul Kowlessar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pdf viewer Hi, I want to pass the pdf file created by fop to a java pdf viewer within an application. Can anyone recommend a viewer that can be

Re: pdf viewer

2001-10-10 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I can't really recommend it but have a look at Acrobat Viewer by Adobe. http://www.adobe.com/products/acrviewer/main.html On Tue, 09 Oct 2001 07:35:53 -0700 Paul Kowlessar wrote: > I want to pass the pdf file created by fop to a java pdf viewer within > an application. Can anyone

Re: pdf viewer

2001-10-10 Thread Ralph LaChance
At 07:35 AM 10/9/01 -0700, you wrote: >I want to pass the pdf file created by fop to a java pdf viewer within >an application. Can anyone recommend a viewer that can be embedded in a >java app The acrobat viewer bean distributed by Adobe ~works~ -- but not, I think, without doing

pdf viewer

2001-10-09 Thread Paul Kowlessar
Hi, I want to pass the pdf file created by fop to a java pdf viewer within an application. Can anyone recommend a viewer that can be embedded in a java app. Cheers...Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For