[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> but I thought these were a function of the unfinished markers in 20.2.
I still don't know what "these" refers to, and
what function is meant.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
08/01/2002 09:30:29
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: table overflow and markers on 20.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The markers work fine
> except in one instance: if ROW4 and ROW5 overflow into the next page,
the
> retrieve marker will pul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The markers work fine
> except in one instance: if ROW4 and ROW5 overflow into the next page, the
> retrieve marker will pull ROW5MARKERDATA1 and ignore ROW4MARKERDATA1 even
> though ROW 4 is a distinctly new row. If more than two rows overflow, it
> seems to work OK (
I just experienced some bizarre marker/table behavior that I hope someone
can shed some light on. I am using fop 0.20.2. Here is the scenario:
Say I have a table that has rows of data and marker data:
ROW1DATA1ROW1DATA2ROW1DATA3ROW1MARKERDATA1
ROW2DATA1ROW2DATA2ROW2DATA3
