DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33808] - problem with large number-rows-spanned

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders

+1 On Mar 25, 2005, at 1:39 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6). Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal vote for a release of our transcoders.

Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders

+1 --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 from me. The code has been stable over the last > few months and seems > to work well for most cases. I also don't see any > other open issues > preventing a release. > > On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > Batik is currently pr

[VOTE:RESULTS] Batik and FOP move to Subversion

Here the results of the "Subversion vote": Batik: +1: 2 (cam, deweese) no other votes FOP: +1: 9 (adelmelle, cbowditch, chrisg, clay, gmazza, jeremias, pietsch, spepping, lfurini) no other votes From the XML Graphics PMC POV this makes 8 out of 9 +1 votes. I'll send the request for the migrati

Re: [VOTE] Batik and FOP to migrate from CVS to Subversion

I think I should throw in my own vote, too. :-) +1 On 21.03.2005 20:53:09 Jeremias Maerki wrote: > As announced on the XML Graphics General mailing list I'd like to call > for a vote on the migration of both Batik and FOP to Subversion. Jeremias Maerki

Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders

+1 from me. The code has been stable over the last few months and seems to work well for most cases. I also don't see any other open issues preventing a release. On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6). > Former Batik releas

[VOTE] Release Transcoders

Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6). Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS HEAD, we don't publish