Negative half-leading trait?

2005-10-03 Thread Manuel Mall
In 6.5.2 it says: The .minimum, .optimum, and .maximum components of the half-leading trait are set to 1/2 the difference of the computed value of the line-height property and the computed value of the sum of the text-altitude and text-depth properties. The .precedence and .conditionality comp

Re: More style issues

2005-10-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: But I'll never define a variable called blockProgressionDimension! I was after weirder stuff. Some random picks: - availIPD (but availableBPD used elsewhere) - avgWidth (but averageLineLength used elsewhere) - bHyph (but hyphen/hyphenate/hyphenation used lesewhere) - bInW

Re: Another page-related question: page-position="last"

2005-10-03 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Oct 3, 2005, at 21:22, J.Pietschmann wrote: Umm, emm, "blank" means no area at all on the page body, not even one with bpd=0. E.g. would create two non-blank pages. Or so I think. I see and fully agree, but IIRC, one of the ideas was to create a sort of dummy-area (internally,

Re: Another page-related question: page-position="last"

2005-10-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
Andreas L Delmelle wrote: [blankety-blank-blanks stuff] Umm, emm, "blank" means no area at all on the page body, not even one with bpd=0. E.g. would create two non-blank pages. Or so I think. I probably have to revise the statement about the last page. I'm feeling somewhat blank now..

Re: Another page-related question: page-position="last"

2005-10-03 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Oct 3, 2005, at 16:11, Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 02.10.2005 00:57:07 J.Pietschmann wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 27.09.2005 16:38:23 Luca Furini wrote: [the usual layout oscillation/convergence problem] What is the expected output? In this case it has to generate a blank page IMO. T

Re: Another page-related question: page-position="last"

2005-10-03 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Ah, so we need to define first, what we really want to expect. :-) Does the spec say anything about the expected behaviour? On 02.10.2005 00:57:07 J.Pietschmann wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > On 27.09.2005 16:38:23 Luca Furini wrote: > [the usual layout oscillation/convergence problem] > >> W