DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37236] - Fix gradients and patterns

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37236] - Fix gradients and patterns

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37236] New: - Fix gradients and patterns

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r328145 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: conf/fop.xconf src/java/org/apache/fop/apps/FOUserAgent.java

On Oct 24, 2005, at 21:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jeremias Date: Mon Oct 24 12:48:37 2005 New Revision: 328145 It's all the same to me. I added the below line for the sole purpose of validating the URL: -URL cfgBaseURL = new URL(cfgBaseDir); But if it goes, the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37116] - ESC POS Renderer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Simplifying the configuration file

I thought about base-url, too, but given that you can also just specify a directory (which is no URL), I like the generic name better. So I left it as is ATM, but if you guys think base-url is better, no problem. Just change it. On 24.10.2005 21:35:28 Simon Pepping wrote: > It is a matter of taste

Re: Simplifying the configuration file

On 24.10.2005 18:33:25 The Web Maestro wrote: > (although I believe dpi is really 'dots per inch' instead of dots per > pixel) Of course. :-) Thx. Change committed: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=328145&view=rev Jeremias Maerki

Re: Simplifying the configuration file

It is a matter of taste if one uses or ./. Either is OK with me, but I do not like seeing it going backward and forward. Anyway, I suggest ./. Giving the resolution in dpi is much better. Simon On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:10:46PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > I'm currently documenting the new

Re: Simplifying the configuration file

Looks like welcome changes to me! (although I believe dpi is really 'dots per inch' instead of dots per pixel) +1 On Oct 24, 2005, at 7:10 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm currently documenting the new configuration layout. I must say it feels a little awkward right now. Does anybody mind if I

Re: Simplifying the configuration file

On Oct 24, 2005, at 16:10, Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm currently documenting the new configuration layout. I must say it feels a little awkward right now. Does anybody mind if I simplify it a little in the following way? Not at all. +1 Cheers, Andreas

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37116] - ESC POS Renderer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37116] - ESC POS Renderer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Simplifying the configuration file

I'm currently documenting the new configuration layout. I must say it feels a little awkward right now. Does anybody mind if I simplify it a little in the following way? Old: New: ./ 72 I think no mortal prefers pixelToMillimeter over a resolution

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37219] - keep.together.within-page=always is not working

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37219] - keep.together.within-page=always is not working

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37219] New: - keep.together.within-page=always is not working

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37116] - ESC POS Renderer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37116] - ESC POS Renderer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Space resolution - merged

Weird, the space resolution branch is merged into trunk since over two hours but the commit message hasn't shown up. Anyway, this is the revision: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?diff_format=h&rev=328010&view=rev All revisions done in the branch: svn log -r 320826:327988 http://svn.apache.org/

Re: Space resolution - ready for merge

I'm going to do the merge today. Big thanks to Simon for doing a review on my stuff!!! On 20.10.2005 21:15:44 Simon Pepping wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:13:53PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > I'm comfortable now with the space resolution code. If it's ok for > > everybody, I'd like to me