Re: Some comments on improving the algorithm for before-floats

On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Ok, I've taken out my LaTeX book again to be sure I understand you. > > >Vincent, > > > >Your proposal to improve the algorithm for the placement of footnotes > >and before-floats sounds fine. A few comments. > > >

Re: [Xmlgraphics-fop Wiki] Update of "GoogleSummerOfCode2006/FloatsImplementationProgress/ImplementingSideFloats" by VincentHennebert

On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 07:04:56PM +0200, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi Simon, > > 2006/8/17, Simon Pepping: > >Rule 7a is logically correct, but I would say that the rule simply > >states that a start float should not stick out at the end side, even > >if it is not the one that is flush with the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40288] New: - url requires "/", failes otherwise

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Xmlgraphics-fop Wiki] Update of "GoogleSummerOfCode2006/FloatsImplementationProgress/ImplementingSideFloats" by VincentHennebert

Hi Simon, 2006/8/17, Simon Pepping: > >Rule 1. Why does the rule not require not both x >= 0 and x + ipd <= > >ipd(ref-area), for both start and end floats, unless the float is > >wider than the ipd(ref-area)? In other words, why is rule 7 not > >required for any start and end floats? > > Hey, y