[Moving to fop-dev as we're going to speak about implementation details]
Andrejus Chaliapinas a écrit :
Hi Jeremias,
I've just checked since I was curious. It's already in 0.90. Seems to
have to do with font metrics. Take a look at the Area Tree XML. The
label has a BPD of 18936 while the
Hi,
Just wonder if that svn suffix in jar name for
xmlgraphics-commons-1.2svn.jar is correct. I could see it under trunk lib
directory.
I think that previously we had just xmlgraphics-commons-1.1.jar
Andrejus
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 17:50, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
[Moving to fop-dev as we're going to speak about implementation
details]
Andrejus Chaliapinas a écrit :
Hi Jeremias,
I've just checked since I was curious. It's already in 0.90. Seems
to have to do with font metrics. Take a look
On Mar 13, 2007, at 12:12, Andrejus Chaliapinas wrote:
Hi Andrejus,
Just wonder if that svn suffix in jar name for
xmlgraphics-commons-1.2svn.jar is correct. I could see it under
trunk lib
directory.
I think that previously we had just xmlgraphics-commons-1.1.jar
That's indeed the
I believe this might probably be an Apache naming convention... but it
may not be such a grand reason... :-)
Andrejus Chaliapinas wrote:
Hi,
Just wonder if that svn suffix in jar name for
xmlgraphics-commons-1.2svn.jar is correct. I could see it under trunk lib
directory.
I think that
On Mar 13, 2007, at 14:51, Manuel Mall wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 17:50, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
snip /
That would imply to change almost every LayoutManager to
compute/transfer this information. Quite a bit of work.
Yes, but I think for slightly different reason. The logic (in the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41831.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
