https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579
Ron Van den Branden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PR
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44434
--- Comment #10 from Andreas L. Delmelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-14
11:26:16 PST ---
FWIW: Nathan just confirmed to me off-list that a slightly tweaked version of
the original stylesheet, using preserved linefeeds instead of neste
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44071
Vincent Hennebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROT
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44607
Vincent Hennebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412
--- Comment #6 from Vincent Hennebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-14 10:41:23
PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Created an attachment (id=21531)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44607
--- Comment #1 from Joerg Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-14 10:29:36
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=21667)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21667)
Example
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apac
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44607
Summary: Endless loop in ElementListUtils
Product: Fop
Version: 0.94
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412
Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44320
Bug 44320 depends on bug 44412, which changed state.
Bug 44412 Summary: Missing border-after when break-after set on a block
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412
What|Old Value |New Val
Hi Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 14.03.2008 12:20:27 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>> The new image loader framework doesn't use Jimi at all anymore. In
>>> theory, the whole old image handling classes can now be removed. It
>>> simply hasn't been done, yet. Deprecati
On 14.03.2008 12:20:27 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > The new image loader framework doesn't use Jimi at all anymore. In
> > theory, the whole old image handling classes can now be removed. It
> > simply hasn't been done, yet. Deprecation is probably not necessary in
> > this
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412
--- Comment #4 from Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-14 04:23:45
PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=21531)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21531) [details]
> Missing borde
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412
Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> The new image loader framework doesn't use Jimi at all anymore. In
> theory, the whole old image handling classes can now be removed. It
> simply hasn't been done, yet. Deprecation is probably not necessary in
> this case as it is not recommended to use the old image stuff
The new image loader framework doesn't use Jimi at all anymore. In
theory, the whole old image handling classes can now be removed. It
simply hasn't been done, yet. Deprecation is probably not necessary in
this case as it is not recommended to use the old image stuff separately.
I wanted to keep th
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Winnebald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-14 02:54:25
PST ---
I had a similar problem: Adobe´s Reader cannot cope with text with a size of
0, whereas other Readers like FoxitReader can. Changed the color of the t
16 matches
Mail list logo
