On 24.11.2008 15:50:40 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > On 24.11.2008 13:14:35 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
> >> Jeremias,
> >>
> >> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >>> Adrian,
> >>>
> >>> I'm unhappy with this change. I know you're constantly trying to
> >>> improve things by refactoring but
Looks like there won't be any more voices. The majority seems to favor a
1.0 release. That's fine by me as long as we can break the 0.x curse.
I'm surprised and grateful that we can finally move forward
version-number-wise.
I think we'll need to announce that release (codename "Curse Breaker" ;-))
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46277
Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailabl
Hi Clay,
Yes with the refactoring and code reuse changes in the Temp_AFPGOCAResource branch, other renderers
can now also take advantage of creating specialized concrete implementations of
AbstractImageHandlerRegistry and ImageHandler. Prior to these changes these features were only
available
Can other potential renderers take advantage of this new declaration,
or is done in an AFP-specific way?
Clay
On 11/24/08, Adrian Cumiskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Chris (and all),
>
> Chris Bowditch wrote:
>
>> Adrian,
>>
>> you've put a lot of work into the GOCA branch and it has some gr
Hi Chris (and all),
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Adrian,
you've put a lot of work into the GOCA branch and it has some great
features, but
There's one thing I don't like, which Jeremias points out in this thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlgraphics-fop-dev/200811.mbox/[EMAIL
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 24.11.2008 13:14:35 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Adrian,
I'm unhappy with this change. I know you're constantly trying to
improve things by refactoring but you also need to be careful about
preserving compatibility. In this case, you broke
Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to call for a merge of the AFP branch [1] back into trunk.
This branch [1] contains a major rewrite of pretty much all the original
AFP code. The majority of
the AFP code is now homed in its own package separate from the renderer
code in org.apach
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46278
--- Comment #1 from Chris Bowditch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-24 06:10:28 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=22926)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22926)
PDF File
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apac
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46278
Summary: AFP Renderer doesn't handle fixed with spaces, e.g. thin
space
Product: Fop
Version: 0.95
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46277
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 06:07:24 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22924)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22924)
Patch proposal
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzi
Hi all,
I would like to call for a merge of the AFP branch [1] back into trunk.
This branch [1] contains a major rewrite of pretty much all the original AFP
code. The majority of
the AFP code is now homed in its own package separate from the renderer code in
org.apache.fop.afp.
The AFPRendere
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46276
Summary: Justified text rendered poorly in AFP Renderer
Product: Fop
Version: 0.95
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46277
Summary: RTF - Block elements with id but without other content
shouldn't create a paragraph
Product: Fop
Version: 0.95
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
St
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41942
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On 24.11.2008 13:14:35 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
> Jeremias,
>
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Adrian,
> >
> > I'm unhappy with this change. I know you're constantly trying to
> > improve things by refactoring but you also need to be careful about
> > preserving compatibility. In this case, you broke m
Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Adrian,
I'm unhappy with this change. I know you're constantly trying to
improve things by refactoring but you also need to be careful about
preserving compatibility. In this case, you broke my external PDF-in-PDF
plug-in by changing the interface from "Class ge
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46272
Chris Bowditch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
-
Adrian,
I'm unhappy with this change. I know you're constantly trying to
improve things by refactoring but you also need to be careful about
preserving compatibility. In this case, you broke my external PDF-in-PDF
plug-in by changing the interface from "Class getSupportedImageClass()"
to "Class[]
19 matches
Mail list logo