https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #2 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-04-16
13:42:31 PST ---
In the meantime, applied the patch locally, and started to look into the
failing tests.
First observations:
- Very good starting point: refactoring the keep-logic ba
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #3 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-04-16
14:08:24 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> * the deferring mechanism may also conflict with regular node recovery
> (restarting from the last deactivated/too short/too long node whe
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #4 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-04-16
15:55:11 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> * keeps have been implemented such that a keep.within-line implies a
> keep.within-column, which implies a keep.within-page. This is almost
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #5 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-04-16
16:44:19 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Previous remark was not entirely correct, yet...
Fact remains: if the child's keep has a higher strength than the parent keep,
it should wi
