That is a better question, but one I cannot answer, as I have not looked
into the CFF support issue. Perhaps another DEV would care to respond.
G.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Ivan Ristic wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> > Ivan,
> > This type of question is b
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> Ivan,
> This type of question is best put to the FOP User
> email list rather than the developer
> list.
Actually, I was offering (or considering) to give back some of the
money FOP saved me (when I self-published my book). I don't think
sen
Ivan,
This type of question is best put to the FOP User <
fop-us...@xmlgraphics.apache.org> email list rather than the developer list.
In any case, nothing is required of FOP for you to be able to make use of
Garamond Pro and other Adobe fonts, though certain advanced typographic
features may not
Glenn,
Thanks for your quick response. I don't know what those things mean,
so I am afraid I can't be more specific. I was talking purely from a
end-user perspective, say, being able to purchase Garamond Pro from
Adobe and plug it in with no trouble.
[BTW, I appreciate the re-send, but I have sub
Resending to original sender.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> What do you mean by "fully"? If you are referring to the OpenType GDEF,
> GSUB, GPOS support, then work is already underway to add that functionality.
> See the following for further info:
>
> http://people.apach
What do you mean by "fully"? If you are referring to the OpenType GDEF,
GSUB, GPOS support, then work is already underway to add that functionality.
See the following for further info:
http://people.apache.org/~spepping/
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ComplexScripts
Regards,
Glenn
On Tue
Hi FOP developers,
Could someone in the know possibly give me an estimate about how much
work is needed to get FOP to fully support OpenType fonts? I
understand that estimates can be tough to work out (and that are often
unreliable), but even having an idea about the needed amount would
help me a
On 17/01/11 18:23, Simon Pepping wrote:
> Wow, on the last day of the fourth year after I committed this script,
> it is proven that someone actually uses it. (I do not use it myself
> since I never work on MS Windows.) I have always considered JScript a
> much smarter solution than the shell in wi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50483
Mehdi Houshmand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26484|0 |1
is obsolete|
