Re: Merge Request - Temp_ComplexScripts into Trunk

2011-10-19 Thread Chris Bowditch
On 18/10/2011 19:55, Simon Pepping wrote: I merged the ComplexScripts branch into trunk. Result: Hi Simon, As well of the question of how to do the merge there is also the question should we do the merge? Of course this is a valuable feature to the community, and Glenn has invested a lot of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52010] [PATCH] Simplification of the build.xml

2011-10-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52010 Peter Hancock changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: Merge Request - Temp_ComplexScripts into Trunk

2011-10-19 Thread Glenn Adams
I provided a detailed comment on Vincent's brief review at: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687#c31 With the exception of the the following comment, the remaining comments are editorial in nature or have no actionable response. > How feasible is it to run the BIDI algorithm

Re: Where's the class?

2011-10-19 Thread mehdi houshmand
Sorry Eric, I meant to say, this is a developer question, could you post questions concerning the code on fop-dev in future. Thanks Mehdi On 19 October 2011 14:47, mehdi houshmand wrote: > Hi Eric, > > The renderers of old were removed quite a while ago in commit#989178. > > Hope that helps > >

RE: Where's the class?

2011-10-19 Thread Eric Douglas
Well, as a user I was using that class to create PDFs with embedded code. Sometimes that user developer line is a little fuzzy. If it's been totally redesigned I apparently need to hunt down some documentation. -Original Message- From: mehdi houshmand [mailto:med1...@gmail.com] Sent: We

Re: Merge Request - Temp_ComplexScripts into Trunk

2011-10-19 Thread Pascal Sancho
HI, IMHO, "Production ready" should only cited before a FOP release, not for a merge of branch to trunk. At this stage, the only questions are about regression tests (and code readability, since open source). Merging the branch now should encourage more users to test these new features and give f

Re: [VOTE] to include the Mockito framework

2011-10-19 Thread Peter Hancock
6 +1 votes and Mockito has has been accepted. Peter On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Pascal Sancho wrote: > Hi, > > +1 for me > > Le 17/10/2011 15:06, Clay Leeds a écrit : >> I'll belly up to the bar and have a Mockito as well... ;-) >> >> +1 >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Oct 13, 2011, at 8

Example crash

2011-10-19 Thread Eric Douglas
What am I missing? I downloaded fop.jar from yesterday's snapshot and ran the example program at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/examples/embedding/ja va/embedding/ExampleJava2D2PDF.java?view=markup It crashed. Stack trace shows: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apac

RE: UNSUBSCRIBE

2011-10-19 Thread j . skrabo
=== Jozef Skrabo Responsable Développement (IED) j.skr...@dalloz.fr tel : 01.40.64.53.12 Editions Dalloz 31-35, rue Froidevaux 75685 PARIS Cedex 14 === De :Matthias Reinert A : fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Date : 18/10/2011 13:07 Objet : UNSU

Re: Example crash

2011-10-19 Thread Jeremias Maerki
There must be something off. Last change to PDFGraphics2D was on 2011-10-15. And in current Trunk the NPE in getString (if any) would have to happen on line 297, not 290. I'm pretty sure you've still go a FOP 1.0 JAR in the classpath or something like that. Please check your classpath. On 19.10.20

Re: Merge Request - Temp_ComplexScripts into Trunk

2011-10-19 Thread Simon Pepping
Over the past ten years computing has pervaded life in all its facets, and spread over the world. As a consequence computing is now used in all languages and all scripts. When I open my devanagari test file in emacs, it just works. When I open it in firefox, it just works. The same when I open it

RE: Merge Request - Temp_ComplexScripts into Trunk

2011-10-19 Thread Jonathan Levinson
We -- at InterSystems -- deploy an application that runs in upwards of 40 countries, using many of the languages for which complex script support is required. We definitely need complex script support. It is a requirement for us. Thanks, Jonathan Levinson Senior Software Developer Object Group

RE: Example crash

2011-10-19 Thread Eric Douglas
I found the incorrect build path reference. Now it just doesn't finish. It gets to that statement: configurator.configure(g2d, cfg); Then doesn't appear to be doing anything. It keeps running back to the call: configure(g2d, createAutoFontsConfiguration()); Then jumps right to the finally block, t

Re: Example crash

2011-10-19 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Works fine for me. Getting no error message is hard to believe since the whole program is in a try..catch(Throwable t). Nothing but a JVM crash gets around that. All assuming, of course, that you didn't change the example program. My console output looks like this: FOP ExampleJava2D2PDF Preparin

RE: Example crash

2011-10-19 Thread Eric Douglas
It appears that test may be hiding the error. I tried putting your main test logic into a test program I had already created. Now I tried creating a new class to put that directly into the main method and I get this crash on test. Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49687] [PATCH] Complex Script Support

2011-10-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687 --- Comment #43 from Dilip Shah 2011-10-20 03:55:40 UTC --- Created attachment 27822 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27822 list of Gujarati words and sentences As per my exchange with Glenn, I've attached a UTF-

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52060] New: PDF/X-3:2002 should go with PDF Version 1.3

2011-10-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 Bug #: 52060 Summary: PDF/X-3:2002 should go with PDF Version 1.3 Product: Fop Version: 1.1dev Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

UNSUBSCRIBE

2011-10-19 Thread Martin Kollar
UNSUBSCRIBE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51385] [PATCH] Configurable PDF version

2011-10-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51385 Willi changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||52060 -- Configure bugmail: https://issue

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52060] PDF/X-3:2002 should go with PDF Version 1.3

2011-10-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 Willi changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||51385 --- Comment #1 from Willi 2011-10-2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52060] PDF/X-3:2002 should go with PDF Version 1.3

2011-10-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 --- Comment #2 from Mehdi Houshmand 2011-10-20 06:56:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Will Version 1.3 be supported? > > "This allows PDF versions to be specified between 1.4-1.7." > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id