To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project xml-fop-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52873
Alex Giotis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52873
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version||All
--- Comment #1 from Glenn Adams
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
Alex Giotis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28412|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52873
Bug #: 52873
Summary: Assertion failure in
o.a.f.complexscripts.fonts.GlyphCoverageTable with
fonts having out of order or duplicate glyph indexes
Product: Fop
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
--- Comment #18 from Mehdi Houshmand 2012-03-09 09:15:10
UTC ---
> Why not just put that in a unit test?? None of this code is tested and a
> little
> mistake could have far-reaching ramifications.
By that I obviously meant the Property
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
--- Comment #17 from Mehdi Houshmand 2012-03-09 09:12:12
UTC ---
> - I don't think we get added value by testing the hashCode() & equals()
> implementations. The tests don't protect from future changes in the tested
> classes (e.g. addin