https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32789
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52873
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
I just noticed that there are 83 bugs [1] that, since the FOP 1.0 release
(2010-07-20), have been marked as *resolved* and *fixed*, but have not been
changed to *closed* status.
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49060
Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51791
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49808
Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50391
Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49752
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909
Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51664
Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51962
Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52089
Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49008
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Hi
I've nearly finished work on getting fop-pdf-image to overlay PDFs by
appending their content streams and merging their resource dictionaries,
rather than by creating XObject Forms. The problem I have left will be
more intrusive into the fop codebase than what I've had to do so far, so
I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
Alex Giotis alex.gio...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50240
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50245
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51144
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50703
Alex Giotis alex.gio...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50699
Alex Giotis alex.gio...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51385
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51596
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
On 28/03/12 07:23, Glenn Adams wrote:
I just noticed that there are 83 bugs [1] that, since the FOP 1.0 release
(2010-07-20), have been marked as *resolved* and *fixed*, but have not been
changed to *closed* status.
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51759
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51789
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51928
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52010
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52136
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52177
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52192
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52197
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52499
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52536
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52992
Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[PATH] National characters |[PATCH]
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52849
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
Alex Giotis alex.gio...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
I wouldn’t bother. Lacking of a proper QA process, we don’t use the
‘verified’ and ‘closed’ status and consider that a bug has been handled
once its status has been changed to ‘fixed’.
Vincent
Not sure I agree with you there Vincent. Giving a bug a closed status
allows us to perform
On 28/03/12 09:58, mehdi houshmand wrote:
I wouldn’t bother. Lacking of a proper QA process, we don’t use the
‘verified’ and ‘closed’ status and consider that a bug has been handled
once its status has been changed to ‘fixed’.
Vincent
Not sure I agree with you there Vincent. Giving a
Hello,
As part of our work addressing URI resolution in FOP [1], Mehdi and
myself have been considering making changes to the configuration and
deployment of FOP. Our proposal will introduce breaking changes to
the public API that will affect code that embeds FOP. Please review
our proposal [2]
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 28/03/12 09:58, mehdi houshmand wrote:
I wouldn’t bother. Lacking of a proper QA process, we don’t use the
‘verified’ and ‘closed’ status and consider that a bug has been handled
once its status has been
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
I just noticed that there are 83 bugs [1] that, since the FOP 1.0 release
(2010-07-20), have been marked as *resolved* and *fixed*, but have not
been changed to *closed* status.
[1]
Hi Peter,
can you please explain what problem you're trying to solve? From the
Wiki pages I cannot derive that. And what do you mean by the separation
of configuration and deployment? I'm particularly clueless as to how an
API affects deployment here.
There must be a really, really good reason
Hi Peter,
The public API could be improved but I also don't see in the wiki links
a good reason to do so. It is expected to have a stable public API,
once a project reaches a 1.0 version. Backwards incompatible changes
are expected in a 2.0 version for methods/classes that have been
deprecated.
46 matches
Mail list logo