On 03/04/12 01:16, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> From a quick look that sounds about right. Are you developing with a 1.7 JDK?
>> You would have to make your code 1.5-compatible. Also, it would be good if
>> you could back your optimizations with profiling data. If code
>> safety/readability have to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53005
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Thanks for the extensive explanation, Mehdi (and Chris)!
First, I'd like to stress that I'm not putting out a veto here. I'm
just trying to take the position of an advocate to the FOP users who
might not all follow the development closely.
Back on the technical side: A JAXP TransformerFactory is
Glenn,
I see the IF API as an advanced use case for FOP. I've realized from the
beginning that the IF might have to mature over time and that requires
changes. My main concern in the whole discussion is stability for the
large majority of FOP's users who just rely directly or indirecly (in
the case
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Glenn,
> I see the IF API as an advanced use case for FOP. I've realized from the
> beginning that the IF might have to mature over time and that requires
> changes. My main concern in the whole discussion is stability for the
> large majori
As a developer who successfully moved our deployment from one FOP
version to the next, we had very few problems transitioning due to pages
like this:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/trunk/upgrading.html
I don't see why this sort of alteration wouldn't be handled here. In my
opinion, the upgrad
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3824
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9379
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48393
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Glenn A
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38862
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from Glenn A
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32100
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35948
--- Comment #12 from Glenn Adams 2012-04-03 20:58:26 UTC ---
vincent, should this bug remain open? is the proposed patch still needed?
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiv
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52398
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37116
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52398
John Poole changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORM
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52398
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
Yes, if you changed IF on me I'd need to know. I embed postscript commands in
headers and page sequences.
That said - if you are talking the java side of it versus the file format
itself that doesn't affect me (but of course it may others)
Thanks
Martin
---
Martin Edge
---
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Martin Edge
wrote:
> Yes, if you changed IF on me I'd need to know. I embed postscript commands
> in headers and page sequences.
>
> That said - if you are talking the java side of it versus the file format
> itself that doesn't affect me (but of course it may other
18 matches
Mail list logo
