I have completed a reintegration merge from fop-1_1 into trunk followed by
a record-only merge on fop-1_1 to allow it to incur future reintegration.
Let me know if you notice anything amiss.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #5 from Glenn Adams ---
Created attachment 29091
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29091&action=edit
test PDF file showing gsub/gpos application
This file shows the output using FOP1.1rc1 with the attac
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #4 from Glenn Adams ---
Created attachment 29090
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29090&action=edit
test FO file showing gsub/gpos application
This FO shows the same data with Angsana UPC with various
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53573
--
You are receiving this mai
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||53577, 53578
--
You are receiving t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53577
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53573
--
You are receiving this mai
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 53578
Assignee: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Summary: explicit script may prevent gsub/gpos application
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53577
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 53577
Assignee: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Summary: explicit language may prevent gsub/gpos application
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from Glenn A
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569
Pascal Sancho changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569
nick.heywo...@altova.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #10 from
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569
Pascal Sancho changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #9 from Pasca
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569
nick.heywo...@altova.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receivin
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #2 from na...@th.ibm.com ---
Thanks for the promptly reply.
Yes, i have tested with FOP 1.0 and it product exactly the same as the first
line of the picture i attached.
There are few Thai fonts that aren't using GSUB and GPOS.
T
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569
--- Comment #8 from nick.heywo...@altova.com ---
Created attachment 29084
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29084&action=edit
Output from fop.bat -d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569
--- Comment #7 from nick.heywo...@altova.com ---
- java -version gives
java version "1.6.0_31"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_31-b05)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.6-b01, mixed mode)
- Calling fop.bat with -d gi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569
Pascal Sancho changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #6 from Pasca
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569
--- Comment #5 from nick.heywo...@altova.com ---
Created attachment 29083
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29083&action=edit
The resulting PDF document
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569
nick.heywo...@altova.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolut
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
Mehdi Houshmand changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Mehdi Ho
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569
Pascal Sancho changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 53573
Assignee: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Summary: Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text
(CTL)
Severity: normal
Classification
22 matches
Mail list logo