https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53724
Matthias Reischenbacher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #4 from
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53852
--- Comment #1 from Mehdi Houshmand ---
Hi Markus,
This commit looks ok, but I don't really use Windows much so I'm slightly
reticent in committing it. Could a Windows user take a look?
Thanks
Mehdi
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #3 from oliver.moeh...@web.de ---
The provided "foptest.fo" from attachment 29402 is in fact a combination of an
XSL and an XSL-FO part to benefit from the tag of XSL. In
Java, I use an identity transformer to produce the PDF ou
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
--- Comment #7 from Pascal Sancho ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I was able to implement the modified design within the allocated time frame:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1390412&view=rev
>
> Thanks for your excellent suggestion!
>
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48302
Pascal Sancho changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24637|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48302
Pascal Sancho changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24636|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
--- Comment #6 from Vincent Hennebert ---
I was able to implement the modified design within the allocated time frame:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1390412&view=rev
Thanks for your excellent suggestion!
Will close the bug once I've up
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48302
--- Comment #8 from Pascal Sancho ---
Created attachment 29417
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29417&action=edit
PDF output with trunk (r1390401)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48302
Pascal Sancho changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #7 from Pascal San
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48302
Mehdi Houshmand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #6 from Meh
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53724
Mehdi Houshmand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from Meh
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
Mehdi Houshmand changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #2 from Mehdi Ho
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53860
Mehdi Houshmand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062
--- Comment #15 from Mehdi Houshmand ---
Sorry, turns out I can't type. I didn't mean to suggest that the unit tests
represent typical use-cases, though they do, they should test a lot more. My
point was merely we have to be careful since F
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062
--- Comment #14 from Mehdi Houshmand ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > As discussed, this commit has been reverted as the user can set the headless
> > or any other JVM argument if they wish to do so. These argum
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062
--- Comment #13 from Glenn Adams ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> As discussed, this commit has been reverted as the user can set the headless
> or any other JVM argument if they wish to do so. These arguments, however,
> should not be set b
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062
--- Comment #12 from Mehdi Houshmand ---
As discussed, this commit has been reverted as the user can set the headless or
any other JVM argument if they wish to do so. These arguments, however, should
not be set by default.
Glenn, should I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53887
Mehdi Houshmand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #4 from Meh
18 matches
Mail list logo
