Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

My preference would be to provide both the CSS3 named properties and also writing system relative properties, giving the user the preference of which to use. But I would suggest using the same pattern as CSS3 for property names for these latter: border-top-left-radius border-top-right-radius borde

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/2012 10:34 AM, The Web Maestro wrote: > Yes... We've got two 'standards' to follow here: XSL-FO and CSS3. > Where possible, I'd like to err on the side of CSS3, since that is > so much more widely used. In fact, where (if?) there are > disc

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Pascal Sancho wrote: > Yes, CSS3 naming is easier to understand. > And like other border-* properties, top, right, bottom, left should be > mapped to equivalent FO directions in lr-tb mode (respectively before, > end, after, start). Yes... We've got two 'standards

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

Yes, CSS3 naming is easier to understand. And like other border-* properties, top, right, bottom, left should be mapped to equivalent FO directions in lr-tb mode (respectively before, end, after, start). 2012/10/12 Clay Leeds : > I would prefer CSS3 naming conventions as well. > > Clay > > "My rel

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

I would prefer CSS3 naming conventions as well. Clay "My religion is simple. My religion is kindness." - HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet On Oct 12, 2012, at 6:48 AM, Peter Hancock wrote: > Thanks for taking the time to review this! > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: >> ...

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

Thanks for taking the time to review this! On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: >... > However, I also notice that the fox property name proposed in [1] contains > uppercase (fox:border-BLOCK-radius-INLINE). That is a definite no-no, and > thus warrants a -1 vote until changed to L

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

I haven't had a chance to look at the details, but does this extension follow the (property name and value) definitions found in CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders [4]? If it doesn't, then my vote is -1; otherwise, I would vote +1. However, I also notice that the fox property name proposed in [1] contai

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

Sounds good! +1 from me! Kind regards, Web Maestro Clay -- - My religion is simple. My religion is kindness. - HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Peter Hancock wrote: > Hi, > > Luis Benardo and Myself have just done some clean up to the bran

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

Hi, Very good job! +1 2012/10/12 Peter Hancock : > Hi, > > Luis Benardo and Myself have just done some clean up to the branch > Temp_RoundedCorners. This branch implements support for 'fox' > extension properties for specifying borders with rounded corners. > Please refer to [1] and [2] for deta

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

+1 On 12 October 2012 10:40, Peter Hancock wrote: > Hi, > > Luis Benardo and Myself have just done some clean up to the branch > Temp_RoundedCorners. This branch implements support for 'fox' > extension properties for specifying borders with rounded corners. > Please refer to [1] and [2] for d

[Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

Hi, Luis Benardo and Myself have just done some clean up to the branch Temp_RoundedCorners. This branch implements support for 'fox' extension properties for specifying borders with rounded corners. Please refer to [1] and [2] for details. There is an example fo [3] that demonstrates the featur