> /
>> Unfortunately, the original reporter did not take the time to reduce
>> the example to a 'minimal' one.
>> ...
>> which makes it more difficult to pinpoint the cause.
>>
>
> I am willing to reduce it a bit, but all next week I won't have an access to
> my PC.
No worries, I already got th
On 2015-07-24 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12558413/FOP_TOC_Bug_T
> est.fo
>
> I tried that one indeed, and noticed it still has misalignments, albeit
> very minor.
Just a note, comparing both FOP-1444-original.pdf and
FOP-1444-original_after.pd
On 2015-07-24 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
> I tried that one indeed, and noticed it still has misalignments, albeit
> very minor. Overall, the alignment does look a bit better than before
> the patch and quite a lot better than the originally attached PDF from
> 8 years ago, but still not entirely
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14640553#comment-14640553
]
Thanasis Giannimaras commented on FOP-1777:
---
Fix for handling kerning for unencode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thanasis Giannimaras updated FOP-1777:
--
Attachment: kerningTrunk.pdf
kerningTrunk.patch
fop.xconf
> On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:00, Andreas L. Delmelle
> wrote:
>
>> On 24 Jul 2015, at 12:08, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
>>
>> Are you referring to Pascal comment from 16/Oct/13? In this case I'd rather
>> create a dedicated issue (if it is still relevant) as the original text and
>> majority of comment
> On 24 Jul 2015, at 12:08, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
>
> On 2015-07-24 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
>> On the other hand, note that it does not (entirely) solve the original
>> issue reported in FOP-1444, which seems to be more related to using
>> fo:page-number-citation.
>
> Are you referring to Pasc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas L. Delmelle updated FOP-1444:
-
Attachment: FOP-1444-original.pdf
FOP-1444-original_after.pdf
* FOP-1444-ori
Hi Andreas,
On 2015-07-24 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
> > On 2015-07-23 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> >
> > Do you expect this difference should be further eliminated or your
> > patch is ready for incorporating into trunk?
>
> ...
> On the other hand, note that it does not (entirely) solve the original
>
Hi Jan
> On 23 Jul 2015, at 21:47, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
>
>
> Do you expect this difference should be further eliminated or your patch is
> ready for incorporating into trunk?
At first glance, it looks like the change can be committed to trunk with little
risk. That is: it does not break any
10 matches
Mail list logo