wasn't really necessary to specify these to achieve some form of
interoperability. The same is not true for hyphenation
dictionaries.
Regards,
John Daggett
- End forwarded message -
--
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
tten-down
guidelines (or automatic checking) for code quality in Batik.
Also, I’m looking forward to the results of the retroweaver experiments,
as I would like to be able to use Java 5 syntactic features in Batik.
--
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
that is present, or fail gracefully otherwise.
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now that FOP requires Java 1.4, does that mean the xml-apis.jar
dependency can be removed?
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> org.apache.xmlgraphics
> xmlgraphics-commons
> 1.2-jdk13
>
> and respective for fop.
OK. I will do the same for Batik then.
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
http://markmail.org/message/xun2cpohbevhothw
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mising though that it’s as easy as taking the jar as already
produced by the build script and slapping a .pom file together with it.
Anybody here against me publishing the artifacts (after Max’s answer to
my question above)?
Thanks,
Cameron
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carlos Sanchez:
> > > groupId should probably be org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik
Cameron McCormack:
> > OK. Does that mean the groupId for FOP and XML Graphics Commons is
> > wrong? (It says org.apache.xmlgraphics in the POM
> > file for both.)
>
Carlos Sanchez:
&g
Hi Carlos.
Carlos Sanchez:
> The best person that will help you is a user of Batik that uses Maven, Lars?
> see some comments inline
Cameron McCormack:
> > First, should I keep the groupId as "batik"? It seems inconsistent with
> > those for FOP
Cameron McCormack:
> Second, how do I deal with the issue of the mutual dependency between
> FOP and Batik? The Batik 1.7 release will depend on Fop 0.93, but in
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/xmlgraphics/fop/0.93/fop-0.93.pom
> it says t
manager just
upload the artifacts to
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ themselves?
Thanks,
Cameron
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be a proper release of the pdf-transcoder.jar from
FOP’s side?
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e end of the Week-end before
> making the release ? I just need to look at bug #43595 (maybe incomplete
> fix for bug 42961), and check a last time that all is with some
> "standard" WMF files to be sure that nothing is broken in that area
> before 1.7.
Sure thing.
--
C
ight now. But
> maybe I'm just too careful...
Fair enough, I can live without the bleeding edge pdf-transcoder in the
1.7 release. (I may make my nightly build scripts pull SVN FOP too, so
that the latest pdf-transcoder can be included.)
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there any more WMF patches that you wanted committed before
the release?
FOP guys, what’s needed to get a pdf-transcoder that runs under Java
1.3 yet has that new PDF text support?
Anything else that anyone thinks is important?
Thanks,
Cameron
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au
still able to be compiled
with Java 1.3? I would like this change to be in the final Batik 1.7
release (whenever that happens, maybe in a few weeks).
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iles, better visible quality, copy/paste
> is possible.
Awesome! I know many people will be pleased with this.
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
edURL() methods to deal with ParsedURLs.
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ngs to do. I’ll see if
I can get to it some time this week.
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/show_bug.cgi?id=42320
Though I think the dependencies may have to be tweaked a little (since
Lars based them on the diagram on the site, which I think is out of
date).
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simon Pepping:
> Herewith I start a vote on this release. The vote will end in 72
> hours, that is, on Saturday 30 December 2006 at noon UTC.
Well done, +1.
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
file by specifically referencing the
xml-apis-ext.jar in Batik’s tree. I guess this should be done properly
in xml-commons, but someone with more gump knowledge than me should
probably do it.
Cameron
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vincent Hennebert:
> If I'm correct Commons should be released first.
Incidentally, is there anything else that needs to be moved from Batik
into Commons?
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cameron McCormack:
> - In “Project History”, “was quickly adopted by many” sounds better
> than “quickly got adopted by many”. Also “prevented important
> features to be implemented” -> “prevent important features from
> being implemented”.
I meant to type “prev
being implemented”.
- It is hard to read the “For more details, please visit …” white text
on the light blue background.
I particularly like the business card example!
Cameron
[1] http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=47&aid=78683
[2] http://digg.com/software/The_New_Vista_Fonts
--
Ca
25 matches
Mail list logo
