Re: [VOTE] Merge the Temp_Accessibility Branch Back to Trunk

2009-10-23 Thread Simon Pepping
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:36:47PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > On 22.10.2009 21:15:40 Simon Pepping wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 05:12:00PM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Work on PDF accessibility is basically done. There are still some tests > > > to perform and m

Inserting Empty Elements Into the Structure Tree [was: Re: [VOTE] Merge the Temp_Accessibility Branch Back to Trunk]

2009-10-23 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi, > >> There's another side-effect to tagged PDF: It allows for better text >> extraction from the document. PDF even describes ways to make >> round-trips from XML -> PDF -> XML -> PDF if certain conditions were met. >> However, we don't do that. > > Speaking of tha

Re: [VOTE] Merge the Temp_Accessibility Branch Back to Trunk

2009-10-23 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 23.10.2009 13:14:36 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi, > > Just a few precisions: > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > On 22.10.2009 21:15:40 Simon Pepping wrote: > > >> Can you summarize what the branch tries to achieve? > > > > I'll try. In short: it provides the Tagged PDF feature that some people

Re: [VOTE] Merge the Temp_Accessibility Branch Back to Trunk

2009-10-23 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi, Just a few precisions: Jeremias Maerki wrote: > On 22.10.2009 21:15:40 Simon Pepping wrote: >> Can you summarize what the branch tries to achieve? > > I'll try. In short: it provides the Tagged PDF feature that some people > have always wanted. > > Long story: Without the accessibility/doc

Re: [VOTE] Merge the Temp_Accessibility Branch Back to Trunk

2009-10-23 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
Hi Vincent, I've take a look this morning and it looks good from the testing I've done - it really increases the PDF file size though! :). +1 from me. Adrian. Chris Bowditch wrote: Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi, Hi Vincent, Work on PDF accessibility is basically done. There are still so

Re: [VOTE] Merge the Temp_Accessibility Branch Back to Trunk

2009-10-22 Thread Chris Bowditch
Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi, Hi Vincent, Work on PDF accessibility is basically done. There are still some tests to perform and maybe a few tweaks here and there, but the main functionality is in place. Thanks for all your hard work getting this feature debugged and cleaned up. So I’d l

Re: [VOTE] Merge the Temp_Accessibility Branch Back to Trunk

2009-10-22 Thread The Web Maestro
Sounds like a lofty and honorable goal. +1 from me. Clay -- - My religion is simple. My religion is kindness. - HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet

Re: [VOTE] Merge the Temp_Accessibility Branch Back to Trunk

2009-10-22 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 22.10.2009 21:15:40 Simon Pepping wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 05:12:00PM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Work on PDF accessibility is basically done. There are still some tests > > to perform and maybe a few tweaks here and there, but the main > > functionality is in place.

Re: [VOTE] Merge the Temp_Accessibility Branch Back to Trunk

2009-10-22 Thread Simon Pepping
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 05:12:00PM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi, > > Work on PDF accessibility is basically done. There are still some tests > to perform and maybe a few tweaks here and there, but the main > functionality is in place. > > So I???d like to start a vote for merging the bran

Re: [VOTE] Merge the Temp_Accessibility Branch Back to Trunk

2009-10-22 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I followed what you did in the branch and I like it, although I can't really follow why accessibility needed to be backported to the old PDFRenderer. So entirely +1 from me. And thanks for diving into this. It's good to know that this knowledge has a broader foundation in the project. And of course