https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #40 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-08-19
13:20:20 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=24152)
small FO demonstrating the remaining problem
Added this attachment to demonstrate the one remaining issue I was
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23916|0 |1
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23990|application/octet-stream
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #35 from Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com 2009-07-07
04:31:23 PST ---
Hi Andreas,
(In reply to comment #32)
(In reply to comment #31)
Hi Vincent,
snip/
And a bit of nit-picking:
- in BlockStackingLM: in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #36 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-07-07
06:42:53 PST ---
(In reply to comment #35)
snip/
Whether it's an IllegalStateException or an UnsupportedOperationException is
really all the same to me.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #37 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-07-07
08:28:19 PST ---
(In reply to comment #36)
snip/
Whether it's an IllegalStateException or an UnsupportedOperationException
is
really all the same to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #34 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-07-03
12:51:41 PST ---
OK, /almost/ there. All existing testcases pass now. The cause of the last
failed testcase (region-body_column-count_3.xml), had something to do
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23411|0 |1
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23916|application/octet-stream
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #31 from Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com 2009-06-26
11:22:22 PST ---
Hi Andreas,
(In reply to comment #29)
Created an attachment (id=23865)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23865)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #32 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-06-26
12:40:51 PST ---
(In reply to comment #31)
Hi Vincent,
I've had a quick look at your patch. I have 2 small comments:
- there are two compilation errors: one
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23799|0 |1
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #28 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-06-24
00:41:33 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23864)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23864)
sample PDF result for the testcase (5 columns)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #26 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-06-22
13:30:03 PST ---
Closing in on completing this one. A real challenge, I must say... Just writing
out some observations, as it generally helps me get closer to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #24 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-06-12
07:05:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #20)
A hunch right after posting this, checked
PageBreakingAlgorithm.recoverFromTooLong(), and thought I'd change the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #25 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-06-12
08:02:52 PST ---
Some more progress: the undesired behavior is also eliminated in case all of
the columns of the first page are occupied.
Trying to explain this
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #19 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-06-11
11:20:41 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23799)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23799)
sample file; basis for a simple testcase
I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #20 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-06-11
11:35:28 PST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Created an attachment (id=23799)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23799) [details]
So far,
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #21 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-06-11
13:05:29 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23800)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23800)
Result w/ 2columns
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #22 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-06-11
13:06:12 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23801)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23801)
Result w/ 3 columns
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #18 from Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com 2009-06-04
00:37:12 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #16)
This won't work. If keep-together.within-column=1 and
keep-together.within-page=always
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #17 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-06-03
11:59:59 PST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
This won't work. If keep-together.within-column=1 and
keep-together.within-page=always then a break must be
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #16 from Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com 2009-06-02
02:49:14 PST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to comment #12)
Still two hyphenation testcases to look at...
Spent quite some time today trying to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #15 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-05-31
09:10:18 PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Still two hyphenation testcases to look at...
Spent quite some time today trying to figure out what was causing
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #11 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-05-29
00:40:15 PST ---
Next failing test was inline_block_nested_6. I have investigated that closer,
and after the changes the global element list on the one hand
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #12 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-05-29
08:19:24 PST ---
Remaining failing testcases are related to tables.
For table-row_keep-together.xml, the reason is that, before the changes in the
patch, we
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #13 from Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com 2009-05-29
10:22:14 PST ---
Hi Andreas,
(In reply to comment #10)
(OK, finally back in shape to continue working on this, and some progress in
the meantime...)
Re: the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #14 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-05-29
12:05:18 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Hi Vincent,
The idea was that a penalty of value infinite and class EN_PAGE become a
penalty of value 0 when
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #9 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-05-28
13:04:08 PST ---
(OK, finally back in shape to continue working on this, and some progress in
the meantime...)
Re: the issue with the failing footnote tests
I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #9 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-05-28
13:04:08 PST ---
(OK, finally back in shape to continue working on this, and some progress in
the meantime...)
Re: the issue with the failing footnote tests
I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #8 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-05-03
14:45:03 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(Sorry for the delay.)
(Me too ;-))
I had to comment that part because it was preventing the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com 2009-04-24
08:43:40 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #0)
* the deferring mechanism may also conflict with regular node recovery
(restarting from
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #6 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-04-19
15:17:19 PST ---
Next batch of 3 failing tests concerns the impact of the changes on the
footnote-splitting mechanism.
The PageBreakingAlgorithm (PBA) no longer
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #2 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-04-16
13:42:31 PST ---
In the meantime, applied the patch locally, and started to look into the
failing tests.
First observations:
- Very good starting point:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #3 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-04-16
14:08:24 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
* the deferring mechanism may also conflict with regular node recovery
(restarting from the last deactivated/too
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #4 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-04-16
15:55:11 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
* keeps have been implemented such that a keep.within-line implies a
keep.within-column, which implies a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #5 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-04-16
16:44:19 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Previous remark was not entirely correct, yet...
Fact remains: if the child's keep has a higher strength than the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #1 from Adrian Cumiskey d...@cumiskey.com 2009-03-24 09:03:02
PST ---
That is a real shame that you will not have time to finish this, certainly
looks like really good useful work :). It will not be easy, but I really
40 matches
Mail list logo
